Comparison Overview

Al Jaber Group

VS

Bouygues Construction

Al Jaber Group

24.379269, 54.469892 6172 Avenue, Musaffah Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi +971, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Al Jaber Group (AJC) is a privately owned, multi-disciplinary conglomerate, based in Abu Dhabi and with branches in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. AJC provides its professional services in the construction, heavy lifting and logistics, manufacturing and trading sectors. With a workforce in excess of 55,000 employees and up-to-date seaside facilities in the industrial hub of Abu Dhabi, AJC is able to meet the constantly changing demands of its target markets with exceptional engineering and information technology. The strength of AJC is derived through controlled growth, diversification and longstanding management. AJC demonstrates its outstanding capabilities through synergistic divisions and resources, operating to deliver seamless results for clients. AJC has engineered and constructed over 7,000 km of Roads, more than 7,000 villas and landmark commercial buildings; it is one of the largest construction contractors in the region. Al Jaber Group is also an industry leader in oil & gas pipelines construction work, oil rigs refurbishment, industrial fabrication, heavy lifting and heavy transportation. The Group possesses over 300 cranes in its fleet as well as the country’s largest construction equipment/vehicle fleet (more than 10,000 units) managed under one umbrella. Moreover, AJC has more than 30 years of history of land and sea transportation/logistics in the UAE, its fleet includes 25 ships with worldwide marine transportation capability.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bouygues Construction

Challenger, 1 Avenue Eugène Freyssinet, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, None, FR, 78 280
Last Update: 2025-12-09

With 32,500 employees working in 60 countries, Bouygues Construction designs, builds and rehabilitates the infrastructures and buildings that are essential for a sustainable society. All over the world, the teams support the development of low-carbon energy production and public transport infrastructures and provide their expertise in the design, construction and renovation of buildings and neighbourhoods essential to life (health, education, work, tourism, leisure, public services, defence, etc.). The teams' commitment is based on three top priorities: safety culture, respect for human rights and ethics.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 25,265
Subsidiaries: 119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/al-jaber-group.jpeg
Al Jaber Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues-construction.jpeg
Bouygues Construction
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Al Jaber Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bouygues Construction
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Al Jaber Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Construction in 2025.

Incident History — Al Jaber Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Al Jaber Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bouygues Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/al-jaber-group.jpeg
Al Jaber Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues-construction.jpeg
Bouygues Construction
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Bouygues Construction company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Al Jaber Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bouygues Construction company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Al Jaber Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bouygues Construction company has reported more cyber incidents than Al Jaber Group company.

Neither Bouygues Construction company nor Al Jaber Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bouygues Construction company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Al Jaber Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Bouygues Construction company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Al Jaber Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Al Jaber Group company nor Bouygues Construction company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Al Jaber Group nor Bouygues Construction holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bouygues Construction company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Al Jaber Group company.

Bouygues Construction company employs more people globally than Al Jaber Group company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Al Jaber Group nor Bouygues Construction holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Al Jaber Group nor Bouygues Construction holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Al Jaber Group nor Bouygues Construction holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Al Jaber Group nor Bouygues Construction holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Al Jaber Group nor Bouygues Construction holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Al Jaber Group nor Bouygues Construction holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N