Comparison Overview

Akiva Health Systems

VS

The Canyon

Akiva Health Systems

Palo Alto, 94303, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Patient-centric disease-specific EHR helping provider and patient access customized applications and personalized tools to generate and interact with (more frequent) health records, much needed for more efficient chronic disease management. Akiva Health Systems provides a game-changing multi-sided platform for more efficient and cost-effective health management. Engaging both providers and patients, and even beyond that, consumers' "circle of health", our customized applications and personalized tools enable interaction with and generation of health records. Our primary focus at this point is mental health and mood/behavioral disorders where traditional EMR systems lack the required tools providers need to diagnose and track patients. Our platform brings simple and understandable views of health data to patients and consumers while retaining clinical credibility of records for providers use. Consumer behavioral change is key to engagement and adoption of our platform which is achieved through traditional physicians authority and baby-steps changes in how consumers/patients and their circle of health interact with and control their health data.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Canyon

2900 Kanan Dume Road, None, Malibu, CA, US, 90265
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Canyon is a state-of-the-art private-pay treatment program housed on 120 beautiful acres near the Malibu coastline. All treatment can be handled on site, from detox to evidence-based treatment to aftercare. Our unique program features luxury accommodations and gourmet food as well as a highly trained medical and counseling staff. We customize our program to fit each individual’s needs and focus on getting to the root causes of addiction to ensure a successful and lasting recovery. Our treatment program is specifically designed to address the multifaceted issues related to co-occurring conditions. At the core of our program is the desire to help each client develop a positive relationship with his or her self and recognize the barriers that keep them from leading the healthy and fulfilling life they want. Addiction doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Most clients seek help for a substance or alcohol abuse issue, but 99.9 percent of the time there is something else going on that contributes to the problem. It may be a history of trauma or abuse or it could be a mental health issue like depression, anxiety or bi-polar disorder. Our goal through our evidence-based treatment model is to not just stop a client’s self-medicating, but to find out what they are using it mask. We then replace that dangerous behavior with new, healthier tools and coping mechanisms to deal with any existing issues. Whether big or small, addressing these underlying issues gives each individual the best possible chance of success in the treatment process and at long-term recovery. Call today for a private consultation. (888) 371-5749

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akiva-health-systems.jpeg
Akiva Health Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-canyon.jpeg
The Canyon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Akiva Health Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Canyon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Akiva Health Systems in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Canyon in 2026.

Incident History — Akiva Health Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akiva Health Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Canyon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Canyon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akiva-health-systems.jpeg
Akiva Health Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-canyon.jpeg
The Canyon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Akiva Health Systems company and The Canyon company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Canyon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Akiva Health Systems company.

In the current year, The Canyon company and Akiva Health Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Canyon company nor Akiva Health Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Canyon company nor Akiva Health Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Canyon company nor Akiva Health Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Akiva Health Systems company nor The Canyon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Akiva Health Systems nor The Canyon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Akiva Health Systems company nor The Canyon company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Akiva Health Systems nor The Canyon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Akiva Health Systems nor The Canyon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Akiva Health Systems nor The Canyon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Akiva Health Systems nor The Canyon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Akiva Health Systems nor The Canyon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Akiva Health Systems nor The Canyon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N