Comparison Overview

Akbank

VS

Lion Finance Group PLC

Akbank

4. Levent Besiktas, Istanbul, 4. Levent, TR, 34330
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Akbank was founded as a local bank in Adana in January 1948. Established originally with the core objective to provide funding to local cotton producers, the Bank opened its first branch in the Sirkeci district of Istanbul on July 14, 1950. In 1954, after relocating its Head Office to Istanbul, the Bank rapidly expanded its branch network and had automated all banking operations by 1963. Floated to the public in 1990, Akbank shares began trading on international markets and as an American Depository Receipt (ADR) after its secondary public offering in 1998. Akbank established AKSecurities in 1996, AKInvestment Trust in 1998, AKAssetManagement Company and its Private Banking Department in 2000 and Ak Pension Company in 2003. Akbank acquired AKLease in 2005 and Ak Pension Company was sold to Ak Insurance in February 2006. Akbank conducts overseas operations through its subsidiaries in Germany (Akbank AG), the Netherlands (Akbank NV) and Dubai (Akbank Dubai Limited) as well as a branch in Malta. As part of the initiative to restructure its overseas subsidiaries, Akbank decided to consolidate Akbank AG and Akbank NV under the corporate umbrella of Akbank AG; the merger is currently underway. In addition to its core banking activities, Akbank offers a wide range of consumer, commercial and SME, corporate and private banking services as well as foreign trade financing. For more information about Akbank, please visit at http://www.akbank.com.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 14,432
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lion Finance Group PLC

None
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

Lion Finance Group PLC (formerly Bank of Georgia Group PLC) is a FTSE 250 holding company, whose main operating subsidiaries are leading, customer-centric universal banks – Bank of Georgia in Georgia and Ameriabank in Armenia. Building on our competitive strengths, we drive business growth and maintain high profitability. We generate strong returns, create opportunities for our stakeholders, and make a positive impact in the communities where we operate.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akbank.jpeg
Akbank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lion-finance-group-plc.jpeg
Lion Finance Group PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Akbank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lion Finance Group PLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Akbank in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lion Finance Group PLC in 2025.

Incident History — Akbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lion Finance Group PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lion Finance Group PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akbank.jpeg
Akbank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lion-finance-group-plc.jpeg
Lion Finance Group PLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Akbank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lion Finance Group PLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lion Finance Group PLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Akbank company.

In the current year, Lion Finance Group PLC company and Akbank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC company nor Akbank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC company nor Akbank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC company nor Akbank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Akbank company nor Lion Finance Group PLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Akbank nor Lion Finance Group PLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Akbank company nor Lion Finance Group PLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Akbank company employs more people globally than Lion Finance Group PLC company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Akbank nor Lion Finance Group PLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Akbank nor Lion Finance Group PLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Akbank nor Lion Finance Group PLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Akbank nor Lion Finance Group PLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Akbank nor Lion Finance Group PLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Akbank nor Lion Finance Group PLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N