Comparison Overview

AJB Stevens Lawyers

VS

Claric Legal Services

AJB Stevens Lawyers

287 Elizabeth St, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

AJB Stevens is a dynamic litigation law firm specialising in family law, will and estate disputes, medical negligence, sexual abuse and compensation law. We pride ourselves on personalised and professional service to protect your rights. Our focus is your case and how we will win. Our Directors are energetic modern-day lawyers looking constantly for new and innovative ways to win your case. Using our claims management method Resolution Plus+ we achieve fast results for maximum compensation. Our Sydney City office is conveniently located at the door step of the District and Local Courts and a short walk to the Supreme Court, Family Court, Workers Compensation Commission and the Motor Accidents Authority. We are also conveniently located at Bankstown in Sydney’s Western Suburbs. Easily accessible by train, bus or car, AJB Stevens is the right choice for your legal dispute.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Claric Legal Services

8 Mercia Business Village, Torwood Close, Coventry CV4 8HX, Coventry, Coventry, CV1 2TT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Thank you for taking the time to view our profile. At Claric we believe that all organisations should have access to affordable legal support along. Our six key objectives are that: 1. We’re easy to get hold of 2. We offer lower costs and value for money 3. We pride ourselves on our responsiveness 4. We won’t lose sight of the commercial realities of your business 5. We offer a bespoke approach with no ‘off the shelf’ solutions 6. We explain everything in layman’s terms We provide legal support to: • Education sector • Private companies • UK & International Companies • Corporate Advisors • Charitable Organisations • Public Sector Our areas of expertise: ► Sale/Supply of Goods/Services ► Distribution and Agency agreements ► Outsourcing ► Collaboration ► Joint Ventures ► Shareholders ► Acquisitions and Disposals ► Website terms and conditions ► Corporate Governance Please get in touch so we can explore how we might help, Richard Jenkins Director 024 7698 0613 / 07837 762705 [email protected]

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ajb-stevens-lawyers.jpeg
AJB Stevens Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AJB Stevens Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Claric Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AJB Stevens Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Claric Legal Services in 2025.

Incident History — AJB Stevens Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AJB Stevens Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Claric Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Claric Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ajb-stevens-lawyers.jpeg
AJB Stevens Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claric-legal-services.jpeg
Claric Legal Services
Incidents

FAQ

AJB Stevens Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Claric Legal Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Claric Legal Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AJB Stevens Lawyers company.

In the current year, Claric Legal Services company and AJB Stevens Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Claric Legal Services company nor AJB Stevens Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Claric Legal Services company nor AJB Stevens Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Claric Legal Services company nor AJB Stevens Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AJB Stevens Lawyers company nor Claric Legal Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AJB Stevens Lawyers nor Claric Legal Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AJB Stevens Lawyers company nor Claric Legal Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AJB Stevens Lawyers company employs more people globally than Claric Legal Services company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither AJB Stevens Lawyers nor Claric Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AJB Stevens Lawyers nor Claric Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AJB Stevens Lawyers nor Claric Legal Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AJB Stevens Lawyers nor Claric Legal Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AJB Stevens Lawyers nor Claric Legal Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AJB Stevens Lawyers nor Claric Legal Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X