Comparison Overview

AJ Images, Inc.

VS

Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.

AJ Images, Inc.

259 East First Ave., Roselle, New Jersey, US, 07203
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ajimages.com

AJ Images is a full service printing company, capable of fulfilling all your printing and graphics requirements from inception to fulfillment. This is accomplished using the latest graphics technology and equipment with old world craftsmanship. Our Staff remains at the forefront of the graphic arts industry with ongoing training and a commitment to continuous improvement. Two generations of graphic arts experience ensure that your job is in good hands. We are Certified a Women Owned Enterprise (WBE), Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), & G7 Master printer. We produced quality commercial printing on Time and on Budget. Projects include Brochures, Newsletters, Annual Reports, Magazines, Technical Pieces, Posters, Postcards, Sell Sheets and Pocket Folders, Bill Stuffers, Direct Mail, Price Lists, Catalogs, POP, Trade Show Graphics, and Banners. We specialize in Business-to-Business and Business-to-Consumer print communications.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.

662 Silver Street, Agawam, Massachusetts, 01001-2987, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bnbindery.com

At Bridgeport National Bindery, we've made books one at a time for nearly 70 years. The idea that each book deserves individual attention and care remains essential to us. We embrace and adapt to rapidly changing technology and constantly strive to make better books, faster. BNB seamlessly integrates today's electronic ordering and on-demand digital printing with our traditional standard of quality. We continue to offer numerous products, services and workflows to meet your needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aj-images-inc..jpeg
AJ Images, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgeport-national-bindery.jpeg
Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AJ Images, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AJ Images, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — AJ Images, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AJ Images, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aj-images-inc..jpeg
AJ Images, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgeport-national-bindery.jpeg
Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AJ Images, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AJ Images, Inc. company.

In the current year, Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company and AJ Images, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company nor AJ Images, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company nor AJ Images, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company nor AJ Images, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AJ Images, Inc. company nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AJ Images, Inc. nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AJ Images, Inc. company nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company employs more people globally than AJ Images, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither AJ Images, Inc. nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AJ Images, Inc. nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AJ Images, Inc. nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AJ Images, Inc. nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AJ Images, Inc. nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AJ Images, Inc. nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References