Comparison Overview

AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd

VS

Critchfield Mechanical, Inc.

AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd

6 Parkland Rd, Osborne Park, WA, 6017, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ajbaker.com.au

AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd is a family owned West Australian company, which has been involved in the commercial refrigeration and air conditioning industry in Australia since 1920. With a national presence in Perth, Brisbane, Melbourne, Sydney and now Adelaide, the company offers installation and maintenance services to the supermarket, commercial food service, entertainment, hospitality and mining industries. We are one of the pioneers in natural refrigerants, with over 300 cascade CO2 supermarket installations, plus 10 state of the art transcritical CO2 installations operational in Australia. The company is also the Australian distributor for the market leading Electronic Shelf Labeling system (ESL) SES.

NAICS: 3334
NAICS Definition: Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Critchfield Mechanical, Inc.

1901 Junction Avenue, San Jose, CA, 95131, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cmihvac.com

Since 1977, Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. (CMI) has been one of the finest mechanical contractors in California, specializing in the design, fabrication and installation of heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. CMI's team of professionals has earned CMI a well-deserved reputation for excellence. Our way of doing first-rate business is to take a proactive approach on each project, giving up front pricing and working as a team with other trades involved in the design and construction process. Regardless of the application CMI is known for quality workmanship, timely project completion and budget consciousness. The depth and breadth of CMI’s mechanical experience is immense: we have completed projects across the country, from Hawaii to New York, Florida, and Washington, and many places in-between. We have designed and built custom systems for hospitals, convention centers, office campuses, data centers, hotels, condominiums, laboratories, schools, and manufacturing plants. Our growing list of satisfied customers includes the Federal Government and U.S. Military, state and local governments, universities, large corporations, and scores of private clients.

NAICS: 3334
NAICS Definition: Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 227
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aj-baker-&-sons-pty-ltd.jpeg
AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/critchfield-mechanical-inc..jpeg
Critchfield Mechanical, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Critchfield Mechanical, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aj-baker-&-sons-pty-ltd.jpeg
AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/critchfield-mechanical-inc..jpeg
Critchfield Mechanical, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd company.

In the current year, Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. company and AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. company nor AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. company nor AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. company nor AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd company nor Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd nor Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd company nor Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. company employs more people globally than AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd nor Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd nor Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd nor Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd nor Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd nor Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AJ Baker & Sons Pty Ltd nor Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References