Comparison Overview

Aither

VS

Jefferson County Department of Health

Aither

45 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

MAKE BETTER DECISIONS. The purpose of Aither (a Ricardo company) is to help governments and businesses make better decisions about globally significant issues. Natural systems are increasingly strained and under threat, creating challenges in water, infrastructure, cities, agriculture and the environment. The future is uncertain, and the stakes are high. We allow our clients to navigate uncertainty and complexity by providing clear, evidence-based analysis, insights and advice. Combining economics, policy and strategy, our advisors help decision-makers to clarify their objectives, address the right problems and opportunities, and continuously improve. Outlined below is an overview the services we provide, of the Aither team, and how we can work to achieve your strategic goals in alignment with your values.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Jefferson County Department of Health

US, 35233
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Health Action is a process conducted by a team of committed organizations seeking community input to improve health in Jefferson County, Alabama. This collaboration resulted in the book, Our Community Roadmap to Health, containing the issues and goals to be addressed by the local public health partners. Results indicate that Jefferson County has a solid public health infrastructure and is able to address the essential public health services. However, there are significant opportunities to improve services by Jefferson County’s public health system for the citizens of the county. By engaging “health partners,” goals have been developed to create sustained efforts in addressing health issues. Any agency, group, or citizen who has a stake in the health of the community is a potential partner, including governmental, public, private, non-profit, and voluntary agencies, as well as groups and individuals committed to the delivery of public health services. This is an ongoing process that determines priority community health needs, gathers scarce community resources, and creates action plans to improve the health of the community.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 268
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aither.jpeg
Aither
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Jefferson County Department of Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aither
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jefferson County Department of Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aither in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jefferson County Department of Health in 2025.

Incident History — Aither (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aither cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jefferson County Department of Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jefferson County Department of Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aither.jpeg
Aither
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Jefferson County Department of Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jefferson County Department of Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aither company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aither company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Jefferson County Department of Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Jefferson County Department of Health company and Aither company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jefferson County Department of Health company nor Aither company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Aither company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Jefferson County Department of Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Jefferson County Department of Health company nor Aither company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aither company nor Jefferson County Department of Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aither nor Jefferson County Department of Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aither company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jefferson County Department of Health company.

Jefferson County Department of Health company employs more people globally than Aither company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Aither nor Jefferson County Department of Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aither nor Jefferson County Department of Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aither nor Jefferson County Department of Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aither nor Jefferson County Department of Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aither nor Jefferson County Department of Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aither nor Jefferson County Department of Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.