Comparison Overview

airpay payment services

VS

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

airpay payment services

Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 650 and 699

With 13+ years of experience, airpay is India's first integrated omnichannel financial services platform. airpay has revolutionised access to financial services in India by empowering a million business owners, extending financial inclusion and last-mile connectivity. airpay's open architecture offers real-time transaction visibility and advanced analytics. It is used globally by consumers, businesses, banks, and financial institutions. airpay is shaping the future of payments from #LocalToGlobal, from India to the Middle East to Africa. Positioned as India's key partner in driving digital financial services adoption with global ambitions, airpay continues to set new standards in the industry.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 632
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. also known as PSBC is a commercial retail bank founded in 2007 and headquartered in Beijing. It provides basic financial services, especially to small and medium enterprises, rural[1] and low income customers. As of December 31, 2017, PSBC has 39,798[2] branches covering all regions of China. PSBC was set up with an initial capital of RMB20 billion in 2007 from the State Post Bureau. Today it has RMB1.5 trillion in deposits and the second largest number of branches, after the Agricultural Bank of China. During the Global Financial Crisis, the government took several measures to spread its national economic stimulus plan specifically to rural areas. This included using microfinance services provided by the Postal Savings Bank as a tool for national development and poverty reduction. The bank with its extremely broad reach also assists China’s credit cooperatives in their microcredit schemes. On December 8, 2015, China Postal Savings Bank, through issuing pro-float stock, received an injection of investment from the Temasek Holdings of Singapore, UBS, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, the International Finance Corporation, Morgan Stanley, DBS Bank, Tencent, Ant Financial Services Group, China Life and China Telecom, with a total investment of 45.1 billion yuan. These "strategic investors" together held a 16.92% stake in the company at the time of purchase. The stock was listed through an initial public offering on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong on September 30, 2016. Prior to its listing, it was the largest unlisted Chinese bank.[3] Xuewen Zhang and Hong Lao serve as Vice Presidents of the bank and co-executive directors.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airpay-india.jpeg
airpay payment services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/postal-savings-bank-of-china-co-ltd-,.jpeg
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
airpay payment services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

airpay payment services has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — airpay payment services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

airpay payment services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airpay-india.jpeg
airpay payment services
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Injection Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Exfiltration
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/postal-savings-bank-of-china-co-ltd-,.jpeg
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to airpay payment services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

airpay payment services company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company has not reported any.

In the current year, airpay payment services company has reported more cyber incidents than Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company nor airpay payment services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

airpay payment services company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company nor airpay payment services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither airpay payment services company nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither airpay payment services nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither airpay payment services company nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

airpay payment services company employs more people globally than Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither airpay payment services nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither airpay payment services nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither airpay payment services nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither airpay payment services nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither airpay payment services nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither airpay payment services nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H