Comparison Overview

AirMark Corporation

VS

Laser Image

AirMark Corporation

10001 Lake City Way NE, Seattle, Washington, 98125, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.airmark.com

As a national sign supply leader, AirMark is focused on improving productivity and profits for the sign, aerospace, and outdoor advertising industries. For more than 30 years, we’ve pushed the boundaries of commercial and industrial imaging equipment, providing companies across the globe with the sign-making production technology they need to win. Through the most advanced vinyl cutting, printing, labeling, and stenciling equipment, we supply businesses just like yours with the tools to transform operations into revenue-generating machines. And if it’s safety, organizational or instructional signage you need, you’ve come to the right place. Name your industry, AirMark has a solution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Laser Image

4018 Patriot Dr #200, Durham, NC, 27703-8083, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.laserimagenc.com

For over 30 years we've helped people get their message out in print and on the web. We are a tight team of bright and energetic professionals operating out of a 15,000 square foot shop in the heart of the Research Triangle Park. We work for businesses large and small, non-profits and individuals. Our strengths are our versatility and speed. We pride ourselves on prompt and personal service. Laser Image Capabilities: + Digital and offset printing + Full bindery + Direct mail + Fulfillment + On-demand document management programs + Personalized direct marketing campaigns + Event support printing

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airmark-corporation.jpeg
AirMark Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-image-printing-marketing.jpeg
Laser Image
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AirMark Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laser Image
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AirMark Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laser Image in 2025.

Incident History — AirMark Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AirMark Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laser Image (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laser Image cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airmark-corporation.jpeg
AirMark Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-image-printing-marketing.jpeg
Laser Image
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AirMark Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Laser Image company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laser Image company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AirMark Corporation company.

In the current year, Laser Image company and AirMark Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laser Image company nor AirMark Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laser Image company nor AirMark Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laser Image company nor AirMark Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AirMark Corporation company nor Laser Image company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AirMark Corporation nor Laser Image holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AirMark Corporation company nor Laser Image company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AirMark Corporation company employs more people globally than Laser Image company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither AirMark Corporation nor Laser Image holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AirMark Corporation nor Laser Image holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AirMark Corporation nor Laser Image holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AirMark Corporation nor Laser Image holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AirMark Corporation nor Laser Image holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AirMark Corporation nor Laser Image holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References