Comparison Overview

Air Age Media

VS

INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au

Air Age Media

88 Danbury Road, 1A, Wilton, 06897, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Air Age Media is a leading enthusiast multimedia company producing the highest-quality content for the world’s most influential audiences. Engaging more than 6 million monthly global consumers across digital, print, and video brands, Air Age Media has a portfolio that includes the most iconic titles in the RC, drone, flight history, and collector industries: RC Car Action, Model Airplane News, Electric Flight, RotorDrone, Die Cast X, and Flight Journal. The company has developed its social media and digital/print platforms to nurture its audience with premium targeted content reaching the super-influential consumer. Air Age Media’s consumers are smart, engaged, and loyal, and they look to Air Age Media’s brands for trustworthy content that will inspire and enable them to enjoy their passions.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au

41 Bridge Rd, Glebe, NSW, 2037, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

INSTYLE is Australia’s leading hairdressing industry magazine and an authoritative source for news, reviews, interviews, profiles and inspiration for salon professionals online and in print. INSTYLE inspires the industry in two weekly newsletters and in print six times per year. In 2021, INSTYLE will deliver Hair Festival over the June long weekend, at Carriageworks, Sydney, offering the industry an opportunity to shop, learn, compete and connect over two important days.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/air-age-media.jpeg
Air Age Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instyle-&-styleicons-com-au.jpeg
INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Air Age Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Air Age Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au in 2025.

Incident History — Air Age Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Air Age Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/air-age-media.jpeg
Air Age Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instyle-&-styleicons-com-au.jpeg
INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Air Age Media company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Air Age Media company.

In the current year, INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company and Air Age Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company nor Air Age Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company nor Air Age Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company nor Air Age Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Air Age Media company nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Air Age Media nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Air Age Media company nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Air Age Media company employs more people globally than INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Air Age Media nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Air Age Media nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Air Age Media nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Air Age Media nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Air Age Media nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Air Age Media nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.