Comparison Overview

Ainsworth Game Technology

VS

William Hill

Ainsworth Game Technology

10 Holker Street, Newington Sydney, NSW 2127, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

In 1995 Len Ainsworth founded Ainsworth Game Technology Limited with a commitment to become the leading manufacturer and supplier of gaming machines, software and related equipment developed. Ainsworth is part of the gaming industry focusing on the design development and manufacturing of gaming machines , software and related equipment supplies. Today Ainsworth is a premier manufacturer of global gaming products with over 200 years of gaming experience, Ainsworth Game Technology is commited to a culture of quality, innovation and excellence. Ainsworth distributes a range of gaming products, entertaining standalone progressives and linked games through its sales offices and distributors in Australia, New Zealand, Asia, USA and Europe. Our vision is clear: • To deliver excellence in Global Gaming Solutions Our mission is concise: • To provide high quality innovative gaming solutions globally • To secure sustainable profitability and growth for all stakeholders

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 201-500
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

William Hill

1 Bedford Avenue, London, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

William Hill started his business in 1934, travelling on a motorbike, taking bets in the local area of Birmingham. Continuing the innovative spirit of our founder, we have grown into an international and multi-brand business which was acquired by evoke, one of the world’s leading online betting and gaming companies. We make a huge investment in our people, offering great career development opportunities. Our colleagues make William Hill what it is and we offer a fast-paced environment where we have fun, celebrate success and give you all the tools you’ll need to be your best self. Join us #behindthebet and find out more.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 5,565
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ainsworth-game-technology.jpeg
Ainsworth Game Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-hill.jpeg
William Hill
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ainsworth Game Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
William Hill
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ainsworth Game Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for William Hill in 2025.

Incident History — Ainsworth Game Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ainsworth Game Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — William Hill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

William Hill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ainsworth-game-technology.jpeg
Ainsworth Game Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-hill.jpeg
William Hill
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

William Hill company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ainsworth Game Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, William Hill company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ainsworth Game Technology company.

In the current year, William Hill company and Ainsworth Game Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither William Hill company nor Ainsworth Game Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither William Hill company nor Ainsworth Game Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither William Hill company nor Ainsworth Game Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ainsworth Game Technology company nor William Hill company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ainsworth Game Technology nor William Hill holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

William Hill company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ainsworth Game Technology company.

Neither Ainsworth Game Technology nor William Hill holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ainsworth Game Technology nor William Hill holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ainsworth Game Technology nor William Hill holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ainsworth Game Technology nor William Hill holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ainsworth Game Technology nor William Hill holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ainsworth Game Technology nor William Hill holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H