Comparison Overview

AIAS di Milano Onlus

VS

BaptistCare

AIAS di Milano Onlus

via Paolo Mantegazza, 10 Milano, 20156, IT
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

AIAS di Milano Onlus opera da oltre 50 anni a Milano e hinterland per migliorare la salute e la qualità della vita delle persone con disabilità. Promuove il benessere, l’autonomia e l’inclusione sociale offrendo servizi in area sanitaria e sociale. AIAS di Milano Onlus fa parte di un’Associazione Nazionale A.I.A.S. (Associazione Italiana Assistenza Spastici) che opera in Itala con 104 sedi distribuite su tutto il territorio.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 201-500
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BaptistCare

Level Two, 22 Brookhollow Avenue Baulkham Hills, NSW 2153, AU
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

We are proud to be part of a newly merged national care organisation, BaptistCare, committed to providing exceptional support and services across Australia. Together, we are building on a shared history of care and compassion, expanding our reach, and strengthening our mission to help people live well with dignity and purpose. Together, we now employ over 12,000 dedicated staff and support over 38,000 customers across NSW, the ACT, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, and Western Australia, offering retirement living, aged care, community housing, and family and community services.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aias-di-milano-onlus.jpeg
AIAS di Milano Onlus
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baptistcare.jpeg
BaptistCare
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
AIAS di Milano Onlus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BaptistCare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIAS di Milano Onlus in 2025.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BaptistCare in 2025.

Incident History — AIAS di Milano Onlus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIAS di Milano Onlus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BaptistCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BaptistCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aias-di-milano-onlus.jpeg
AIAS di Milano Onlus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baptistcare.jpeg
BaptistCare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both AIAS di Milano Onlus company and BaptistCare company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, BaptistCare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AIAS di Milano Onlus company.

In the current year, BaptistCare company and AIAS di Milano Onlus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BaptistCare company nor AIAS di Milano Onlus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BaptistCare company nor AIAS di Milano Onlus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BaptistCare company nor AIAS di Milano Onlus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AIAS di Milano Onlus company nor BaptistCare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AIAS di Milano Onlus company nor BaptistCare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither AIAS di Milano Onlus company nor BaptistCare company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X