Comparison Overview

AIA Singapore

VS

Bajaj Life

AIA Singapore

1 Robinson Road, #13-00, AIA Tower, Singapore, SG, 048542
Last Update: 2026-01-17

AIA Singapore is part of the AIA Group, which is the largest independent publicly listed pan-Asian life insurance group in the world and the second largest life insurance company in the world by market capitalisation. As a leading company in Singapore, AIA Singapore takes a leadership role in contributing to the nation’s social and economic progress by enabling families to live healthier, longer, better lives. Together with one of Singapore’s biggest and most committed team of AIA Financial Services Consultants, our dedicated staff are united in continually pursuing this goal. With a focus on providing excellent service to our customers, we partner with individuals, families and corporates in Singapore for a brighter and more prosperous future for all. Committed to the vision of being the pre-eminent life insurer in the country, admired for excellent service and best practices, AIA Singapore conducts our business according to an operating philosophy of “Doing the Right Thing, in the Right Way, with the Right People."​ Any personal information supplied by you in connection with your use of this social media platform may be collected, stored, handled, used and deleted in accordance with the AIA Singapore Privacy Policy available at http://www.aia.com.sg/en/index/personal-data-policy.html

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 3,288
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Bajaj Life

Bajaj Allianz House, Yerwada, Pune, 411 006, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Bajaj Life Insurance is among the fastest-growing life insurance companies in India, offering a wide range of plans, from ULIPs and term insurance to retirement and child policies, helping you secure your future and achieve your life goals. With over 3.85 crore policyholders, an AUM of ₹1.3 Lakh Crores, a 99.29% claim settlement ratio, and a 343% solvency margin, we are committed to delivering financial protection, wealth creation, and peace of mind at every stage of life. Our Popular Life Insurance Products: ULIPs (Unit Linked Insurance Plans): Zero Allocation Charge ULIP designed for long-term wealth creation, with return of mortality charges. Term Insurance Plans: Includes India’s first Term Plan for Diabetics, offering affordable protection for all. SISO (Systematic In/Systematic Out): A smart investment approach for disciplined wealth building. Bajaj Life ACE: A flexible plan that lets you choose income options as per your financial needs. Bajaj Superwoman Term: A term protection solution specifically designed for women. Our extensive service on WhatsApp Conversational Platform ensures convenience and easy accessibility to our customer right at their fingertips. With a strong distribution network of 597 branches, over 1.62 lakh insurance consultants, and partnerships with India’s leading banks, Bajaj Life ensures easy access and customer-first service. We pride ourselves in creating a culture that fosters an innovative mindset and collaboration among our 25K+ employees who have made Bajaj Life a Great Place to Work for. Recent Accolades: 1. World’s Digital Insurance Award 2025 for Innovative Smart Assist Platform 2. Best Employer India by Kincentric, 2023, 2022, 2021 3. India’s No. 1 Top Riser Brand by Kantar BrandZ, 2022 Reach out to: 020-6712 1212| For complaints/queries: [email protected] To buy, call 18002094040 or Visit our website: https://www.bajajlifeinsurance.com

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 21,475
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aia-singapore.jpeg
AIA Singapore
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-life.jpeg
Bajaj Life
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AIA Singapore
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bajaj Life
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIA Singapore in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bajaj Life in 2026.

Incident History — AIA Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIA Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bajaj Life (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bajaj Life cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aia-singapore.jpeg
AIA Singapore
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2019
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-life.jpeg
Bajaj Life
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bajaj Life company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AIA Singapore company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AIA Singapore company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bajaj Life company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bajaj Life company and AIA Singapore company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bajaj Life company nor AIA Singapore company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bajaj Life company nor AIA Singapore company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bajaj Life company nor AIA Singapore company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AIA Singapore company nor Bajaj Life company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AIA Singapore nor Bajaj Life holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AIA Singapore company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bajaj Life company.

Bajaj Life company employs more people globally than AIA Singapore company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither AIA Singapore nor Bajaj Life holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AIA Singapore nor Bajaj Life holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AIA Singapore nor Bajaj Life holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AIA Singapore nor Bajaj Life holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AIA Singapore nor Bajaj Life holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AIA Singapore nor Bajaj Life holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N