Comparison Overview

AgriSafe Network

VS

PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle

AgriSafe Network

8342 NICC Drive, Peosta, Iowa 52068, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

AgriSafe is an international 501©3 organization representing health and safety professionals who strive to reduce health disparities found among the agricultural community. Our mission is to support a growing network of trained agricultural health and safety professionals that assure access to preventative services for farm families and the agricultural community. Our impact is realized across the globe because we utilize web-based technology to deliver the best trainings by experts in the field.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

PSI est une organisation internationale présente dans plus de 60 pays et travaille dans le domaine de la santé avec des programmes ciblant la lutte contre le paludisme, la santé de la mère, du nouveau-né et de l’enfant, la nutrition, la prévention du VIH, la santé de la reproduction, la planification familiale et les maladies non transmissibles et la lutte contre la COVID-19. Travaillant en collaboration avec les secteurs public, privé et exploitant l’existence des marchés, PSI fournit des produits, des services cliniques, effectue des campagnes de communication pour le changement social et comportemental afin d’aider à bâtir des solutions durables contre les problèmes sanitaires existants. Depuis son implantation à Madagascar en 1998, avec l’appui des bailleurs, des fondations privées et partenaires locaux, PSI/Madagascar a travaillé en partenariat avec le Ministère de la Santé Publique pour améliorer la santé de la population malgache vers des « Vies Saines, Résultats Mesurables ».

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 271
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
AgriSafe Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psi-madagascar.jpeg
PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AgriSafe Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AgriSafe Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle in 2025.

Incident History — AgriSafe Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AgriSafe Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
AgriSafe Network
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psi-madagascar.jpeg
PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AgriSafe Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AgriSafe Network company.

In the current year, PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle company and AgriSafe Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle company nor AgriSafe Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle company nor AgriSafe Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle company nor AgriSafe Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AgriSafe Network company nor PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AgriSafe Network nor PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AgriSafe Network company nor PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle company employs more people globally than AgriSafe Network company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither AgriSafe Network nor PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AgriSafe Network nor PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AgriSafe Network nor PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AgriSafe Network nor PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AgriSafe Network nor PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AgriSafe Network nor PSI Madagascar - Page Officielle holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H