Agricultural Bank of China
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849
wholly state-owned
NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 14,747
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Comparison Overview
Agricultural Bank of China
VS
Federal Bank
Federal Bank
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
Federal Bank, one of the leading private sector banks with presence across the country, began its journey from humble backgrounds to reach the stature of an institution with national prominence & character. With a rich legacy of 7 decades, the Bank aspires to be the most admired Bank in the country and fueling its dreams are the 19 million and growing customer base who have always been loyal to the Bank as the Bank is to them. Headquartered in Aluva, Kerala, the Bank’s scrips are widely held and are listed in the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange in India. The Bank’s global depository receipts are listed on the London Stock Exchange. The Bank has built its empire on the twin values of ethics and excellence, and this has propelled the Bank throughout its journey. Over 1,588 branches, 2079+ ATMs/ Cash Recyclers and a committed, experienced & energetic workforce, Federal Bank now has its presence across the nation. To service the NRIs, who have been its pillars of strength, the Bank operates Representative Offices at Dubai and Abu Dhabi in the UAE. The Bank today handles one fifth of the total NR remittance to the country and this is testimony to its relationship with the NR diaspora. The Bank also has an IFSC Banking Unit (IBU) in Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT City). Transformation is inevitable and for Federal Bank it has been no different. The Bank believes in transforming itself, keeping its principles intact, to match the beats of the industry and the expectations of its stakeholders. Technology is the new buzzword, and it has left its indelible mark in the banking industry as well. Disclaimer: Federal Bank advices against sharing any confidential information on social media handles of the Bank
NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 11,893
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Agricultural Bank of China
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Federal Bank
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Agricultural Bank of China
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Federal Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Agricultural Bank of China in 2025.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Federal Bank in 2025.
Incident History — Agricultural Bank of China (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Agricultural Bank of China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Federal Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Federal Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Agricultural Bank of China
Incidents
No Incident
Federal Bank
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
Agricultural Bank of China company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Federal Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Historically, Federal Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Agricultural Bank of China company.
In the current year, Federal Bank company and Agricultural Bank of China company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither Federal Bank company nor Agricultural Bank of China company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Neither Federal Bank company nor Agricultural Bank of China company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
Neither Federal Bank company nor Agricultural Bank of China company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Agricultural Bank of China company nor Federal Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Agricultural Bank of China nor Federal Bank holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Federal Bank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Agricultural Bank of China company.
Agricultural Bank of China company employs more people globally than Federal Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.
Neither Agricultural Bank of China nor Federal Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Agricultural Bank of China nor Federal Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Agricultural Bank of China nor Federal Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Agricultural Bank of China nor Federal Bank holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Agricultural Bank of China nor Federal Bank holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Agricultural Bank of China nor Federal Bank holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description
A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
