Comparison Overview

AgeRight

VS

Visiting Angels

AgeRight

4560 SE International Way, Milwaukie, 97222, US
Last Update: 2026-01-24

You have probably found yourself or your loved one in a place where some daily challenges are arising, but there is a strong desire to stay in the home. These challenges can be temporary or ongoing and different for each person. Someone may just need help with keeping up and monitoring their medicine and another might be struggling with picking up groceries and fixing meals for themselves. Wherever you are, AgeRight Care at Home has the flexibility and resources to meet your needs.

NAICS: 6216
NAICS Definition: Home Health Care Services
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Visiting Angels

937 Haverford Road, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 19010, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

America's Choice in Home Care and Caregiver's Choice in Employment. Visiting Angels in-home care helps make it possible for seniors and adults with special needs to continue to live at home; while maintaining the independence of their daily routines and familiar surroundings. We provide non-medical home care customized to the needs of each client. Our caregivers are the lifeblood of our business, providing compassionate and dependable assistance with the activities of everyday living to seniors, the disabled, and those recovering from surgery. Our services include light housekeeping, meal preparation, errands and shopping, and personal hygiene assistance. Above all, Visiting Angels services help families spend mutually-rewarding and meaningful time with their loved ones and help provide comfort and peace of mind to those who face the challenge of long-distance caregiving.

NAICS: 6216
NAICS Definition: Home Health Care Services
Employees: 10,107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ageright.jpeg
AgeRight
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/visitingangels.jpeg
Visiting Angels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AgeRight
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Visiting Angels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Home Health Care Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AgeRight in 2026.

Incidents vs Home Health Care Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Visiting Angels in 2026.

Incident History — AgeRight (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AgeRight cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Visiting Angels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Visiting Angels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ageright.jpeg
AgeRight
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain, data extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/visitingangels.jpeg
Visiting Angels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Visiting Angels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AgeRight company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AgeRight company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Visiting Angels company has not reported any.

In the current year, Visiting Angels company and AgeRight company have not reported any cyber incidents.

AgeRight company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Visiting Angels company has not reported such incidents publicly.

AgeRight company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Visiting Angels company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Visiting Angels company nor AgeRight company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AgeRight company nor Visiting Angels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AgeRight nor Visiting Angels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AgeRight company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Visiting Angels company.

Visiting Angels company employs more people globally than AgeRight company, reflecting its scale as a Home Health Care Services.

Neither AgeRight nor Visiting Angels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AgeRight nor Visiting Angels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AgeRight nor Visiting Angels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AgeRight nor Visiting Angels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AgeRight nor Visiting Angels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AgeRight nor Visiting Angels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.