Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AgeRightAgeRight
VS
Visiting AngelsVisiting Angels
AgeRight

AgeRight

4560 SE International Way, Milwaukie, 97222, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
675/1000Weak

You have probably found yourself or your loved one in a place where some daily challenges are arising, but there is a strong desire to stay in the home. These challenges can be temporary or ongoing and different for each person. Someone may just need help with keeping u...

NAICS:6216
NAICS Definition:Home Health Care Services
Employees:36
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Visiting Angels

Visiting Angels

937 Haverford Road, Bryn Mawr, 19010, US

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
771/1000Fair

America's Choice in Home Care and Caregiver's Choice in Employment. Visiting Angels in-home care helps make it possible for seniors and adults with special needs to continue to live at home; while maintaining the independence of their daily routines and familiar surroun...

NAICS:6216
NAICS Definition:Home Health Care Services
Employees:11,298
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AgeRight

AgeRight

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Visiting Angels

Visiting Angels

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Home Health Care Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AgeRight in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Home Health Care Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Visiting Angels in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AgeRight (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AgeRight cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Visiting Angels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Visiting Angels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AgeRight

AgeRight

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AGE1765907858
Visiting Angels

Visiting Angels

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AgeRight company and Visiting Angels company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AgeRight and Visiting Angels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AgeRight and Visiting Angels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AgeRight or Visiting Angels ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AgeRight or Visiting Angels ?
Between AgeRight and Visiting Angels, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AgeRight and Visiting Angels, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA