Comparison Overview

AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT

VS

New England Power Generators Association

AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT

75 Wrose Road, Shipley, Bradford, West Yorkshire, GB, BD18 1HX
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Age UK Bradford District supports and enables people in the following areas: Information Help and Support Advice Activities These are delivered from Community Hubs in Wrose, Idle, Keighley, Allerton, Queensbury and Shipley. Much of our funding comes from our Community Hubs. We also rely on donations and legacies from members of the public, partnerships with local businesses, fundraising events, campaigns and some charitable grants to continue our important work.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New England Power Generators Association

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The New England Power Generators Association (NEPGA) is the trade association representing over 90% of the electric generating capacity in the region. NEPGA’s mission is to support competitive wholesale electricity markets in New England. We believe that open markets guided by stable public policies are the best means to provide reliable and competitively-priced electricity for consumers. A sensible, market-based approach furthers economic development, jobs and balanced environmental policy for the region.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/age-uk-bradford-district.jpeg
AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-england-power-generators-association.jpeg
New England Power Generators Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New England Power Generators Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New England Power Generators Association in 2025.

Incident History — AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New England Power Generators Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New England Power Generators Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/age-uk-bradford-district.jpeg
AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-england-power-generators-association.jpeg
New England Power Generators Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New England Power Generators Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, New England Power Generators Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT company.

In the current year, New England Power Generators Association company and AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New England Power Generators Association company nor AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New England Power Generators Association company nor AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New England Power Generators Association company nor AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT company nor New England Power Generators Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT nor New England Power Generators Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT company nor New England Power Generators Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT company employs more people globally than New England Power Generators Association company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT nor New England Power Generators Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT nor New England Power Generators Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT nor New England Power Generators Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT nor New England Power Generators Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT nor New England Power Generators Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AGE UK BRADFORD DISTRICT nor New England Power Generators Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H