Comparison Overview

AFTS

VS

Integrity Print

AFTS

151 South Lander Street, Suite C, Seattle, WA, US, 98134
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

Automatic Funds Transfer Services (AFTS) provides outsourced solutions related to billing and statement printing, coupon book manufacturing, mailing and related payment processing. We support "checks-in-the-mail" payments, and online WebPay or telephone PhonePay portal services. Wish to automate your payments, our ACH origination services meet this need. AFTS is a NCOA provider processing over 200 million addresses monthly. Let us help you find your customers when they have moved.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Integrity Print

Westfield Trading Estate, Bath, BA3 4BS, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Integrity Print is a leading provider of operational business print requirements, encompassing the production of: • Base Stationery • Integrated Cards • Integrated Labels • Security Print • Digital Colour Printing • Direct Mail Printing • Direct Mail Personalisation • Operational Print • Inserts • Flyers • Door Drops • Critical NHS Supplies • Pressure Seal Forms • Paper Wraps • Labels and Packaging The company continues to deliver exceptionally sound financial performances in challenging market sector. In recent years strong sales growth has been achieved without sacrificing profitability. Top line sales growth allied with sound financial management has enabled the business to invest in both technology and people. The business performance has been underpinned by a stable, skilled and well motivated workforce led with passion and vision by a management team that is committed to building a World Class printing business with a long term future.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afts.jpeg
AFTS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrity-print.jpeg
Integrity Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AFTS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Integrity Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFTS in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Integrity Print in 2025.

Incident History — AFTS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFTS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Integrity Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Integrity Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afts.jpeg
AFTS
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrity-print.jpeg
Integrity Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Integrity Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AFTS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AFTS company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Integrity Print company has not reported any.

In the current year, Integrity Print company and AFTS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

AFTS company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Integrity Print company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Integrity Print company nor AFTS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Integrity Print company nor AFTS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AFTS company nor Integrity Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AFTS nor Integrity Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AFTS company nor Integrity Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Integrity Print company employs more people globally than AFTS company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither AFTS nor Integrity Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AFTS nor Integrity Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AFTS nor Integrity Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AFTS nor Integrity Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AFTS nor Integrity Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AFTS nor Integrity Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N