Comparison Overview

AFS Center for Justice

VS

Litigation Services, LLC

AFS Center for Justice

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

ArentFox Schiff’s commitment to public interest dates back to the firm’s founding partners. The Center is a continuation of this pledge and leverages the firm’s substantial pro bono commitment. Among our accomplishments, we highlight our partnership with Thurgood Marshall Civil Rights Center and affiliations with NAACP LDF, LCCRUL, and more.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Litigation Services, LLC

3770 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite #300, Las Vegas, NV, 89169, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Litigation Services is a global leader of court reporting, litigation support and trial consulting services. Specializing in depositions for complex and multi-party litigation, our dedicated team is committed to delivering around the clock and across the globe client service. We understand client needs, whether they be regional or global, and provide reliable service with a personal touch. For 20 years Litigation Services combines the highest level of technical skill with unparalleled commitment to client service. We have 1,500 court reporters that help provide service in all 50 states; plus 26 different countries.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afscre.jpeg
AFS Center for Justice
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litigation-services.jpeg
Litigation Services, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AFS Center for Justice
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Litigation Services, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFS Center for Justice in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Litigation Services, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — AFS Center for Justice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFS Center for Justice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Litigation Services, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Litigation Services, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afscre.jpeg
AFS Center for Justice
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litigation-services.jpeg
Litigation Services, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AFS Center for Justice company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Litigation Services, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AFS Center for Justice company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Litigation Services, LLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Litigation Services, LLC company and AFS Center for Justice company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Litigation Services, LLC company nor AFS Center for Justice company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

AFS Center for Justice company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Litigation Services, LLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Litigation Services, LLC company nor AFS Center for Justice company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AFS Center for Justice company nor Litigation Services, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AFS Center for Justice nor Litigation Services, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AFS Center for Justice company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Litigation Services, LLC company.

Neither AFS Center for Justice nor Litigation Services, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AFS Center for Justice nor Litigation Services, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AFS Center for Justice nor Litigation Services, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AFS Center for Justice nor Litigation Services, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AFS Center for Justice nor Litigation Services, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AFS Center for Justice nor Litigation Services, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X