Comparison Overview

AFL Enterprises

VS

WithinReach

AFL Enterprises

undefined, Denver, CO, 80238, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

SBA Certified 8 (a), WOSB. AFL Enterprises, LLC, is a public health project planning, implementation, and management company. AFL works with organizations to test and implement new ideas and find efficiencies in their work. We also support organizations by instructing health care providers and informing them about current, evidence-based best practices, recent innovations, and areas for growth and research in the field of public health. Interested in learning more about what AFL can do for you? Give us a call at 1.720.439.9732‬ or email us at [email protected].

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

WithinReach

155 NE 100th St., #500, Seattle, 98125, US
Last Update:

Finding the right help is hard. WithinReach makes it easy. Our mission is to build pathways to make it easier for Washington families to navigate our complex health and social service systems, and connect with the resources they need to be healthy and safe. We serve as a trusted link to critical resources, and create and advocate for innovative solutions that improve overall health and health equity. Our websites: www.withinreachwa.org www.parenthelp123.org www.immunitycommunitywa.org

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afl-enterprises.jpeg
AFL Enterprises
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/withinreach.jpeg
WithinReach
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AFL Enterprises
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WithinReach
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFL Enterprises in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WithinReach in 2025.

Incident History — AFL Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFL Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WithinReach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WithinReach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afl-enterprises.jpeg
AFL Enterprises
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/withinreach.jpeg
WithinReach
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both AFL Enterprises company and WithinReach company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, WithinReach company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AFL Enterprises company.

In the current year, WithinReach company and AFL Enterprises company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WithinReach company nor AFL Enterprises company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither WithinReach company nor AFL Enterprises company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither WithinReach company nor AFL Enterprises company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AFL Enterprises company nor WithinReach company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor WithinReach holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AFL Enterprises company nor WithinReach company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

WithinReach company employs more people globally than AFL Enterprises company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor WithinReach holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor WithinReach holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor WithinReach holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor WithinReach holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor WithinReach holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor WithinReach holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H