Comparison Overview

AFL Enterprises

VS

Dairy Council of California

AFL Enterprises

undefined, Denver, CO, 80238, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

SBA Certified 8 (a), WOSB. AFL Enterprises, LLC, is a public health project planning, implementation, and management company. AFL works with organizations to test and implement new ideas and find efficiencies in their work. We also support organizations by instructing health care providers and informing them about current, evidence-based best practices, recent innovations, and areas for growth and research in the field of public health. Interested in learning more about what AFL can do for you? Give us a call at 1.720.439.9732‬ or email us at [email protected].

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dairy Council of California

1418 N Market Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95834, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

For over a century, Dairy Council of California has empowered stakeholders, including educators, health professionals and community leaders, to elevate the health of children and families through the pursuit of lifelong healthy eating habits. Funded by California’s dairy farm families, local milk processors and under the guidance of California Department of Food and Agriculture, Dairy Council of California’s science-based nutrition education resources, Mobile Dairy Classroom assemblies, training programs and online resources are available at no cost, helping provide nutrition education to millions of students and communities in California and throughout the United States. Learn more at DairyCouncilofCA.org

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afl-enterprises.jpeg
AFL Enterprises
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dairy-council-of-california.jpeg
Dairy Council of California
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AFL Enterprises
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dairy Council of California
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFL Enterprises in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dairy Council of California in 2025.

Incident History — AFL Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFL Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dairy Council of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dairy Council of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afl-enterprises.jpeg
AFL Enterprises
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dairy-council-of-california.jpeg
Dairy Council of California
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AFL Enterprises company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dairy Council of California company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dairy Council of California company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AFL Enterprises company.

In the current year, Dairy Council of California company and AFL Enterprises company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dairy Council of California company nor AFL Enterprises company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dairy Council of California company nor AFL Enterprises company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dairy Council of California company nor AFL Enterprises company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AFL Enterprises company nor Dairy Council of California company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor Dairy Council of California holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AFL Enterprises company nor Dairy Council of California company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dairy Council of California company employs more people globally than AFL Enterprises company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor Dairy Council of California holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor Dairy Council of California holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor Dairy Council of California holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor Dairy Council of California holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor Dairy Council of California holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AFL Enterprises nor Dairy Council of California holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H