Comparison Overview

AFL-CIO

VS

Creative UK

AFL-CIO

815 16th St NW, None, Washington, DC, US, 20006
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The AFL-CIO represents people who work. We are the umbrella federation for U.S. unions, with 57 unions representing more than 12.5 million working men and women. The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations is an expression of the hopes and aspirations of the working people of America. We resolve to fulfill the yearning of the human spirit for liberty, justice and community; to advance individual and associational freedom; to vanquish ­oppression, privation and cruelty in all their forms; and to join with all persons, of whatever nationality or faith, who cherish the cause of democracy and the call of solidarity, to grace the planet with these achievements. We dedicate ourselves to improving the lives of working families, bringing fairness and dignity to the workplace and securing social equity in the nation.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 749
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Creative UK

Tomorrow Building, 130 Broadway, 2nd Floor / Suite 7, MediaCityUK, Salford, GB, M50 2UW
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Here for those who dare to imagine. Creative UK works to harness the power of the Creative Industries to build a stronger, fairer, and more prosperous future. Creative UK is the result of the Creative Industries Federation and Creative England coming together under one brand identity. We will continue to support creative people and businesses through our investment, business and industry growth initiatives, including our England-only activity with support from the BFI and National Lottery funding. We will continue to connect and champion the creative sector through our membership and advocacy work.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 163
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afl-cio.jpeg
AFL-CIO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creativeukgroup.jpeg
Creative UK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AFL-CIO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Creative UK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFL-CIO in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Creative UK in 2025.

Incident History — AFL-CIO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFL-CIO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Creative UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Creative UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afl-cio.jpeg
AFL-CIO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creativeukgroup.jpeg
Creative UK
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AFL-CIO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Creative UK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Creative UK company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AFL-CIO company.

In the current year, Creative UK company and AFL-CIO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Creative UK company nor AFL-CIO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Creative UK company nor AFL-CIO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Creative UK company nor AFL-CIO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AFL-CIO company nor Creative UK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AFL-CIO nor Creative UK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Creative UK company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AFL-CIO company.

AFL-CIO company employs more people globally than Creative UK company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither AFL-CIO nor Creative UK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AFL-CIO nor Creative UK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AFL-CIO nor Creative UK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AFL-CIO nor Creative UK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AFL-CIO nor Creative UK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AFL-CIO nor Creative UK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H