Comparison Overview

AFJE

VS

International Law Association (Australian Branch)

AFJE

5, Rue du Chevalier de Saint-George, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

L’AFJE, Association Française des juristes d'entreprise, est l'organisation professionnelle des juristes d’entreprise en France. Sa mission phare depuis plus de 50 ans est la promotion du métier de juriste d'entreprise et des directions juridiques. Forte de plus de 7000 adhérents, l'AFJE fédère 28% des juristes d'entreprise de France. Rejoignez le réseau AFJE!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

International Law Association (Australian Branch)

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

The International Law Association was founded in Brussels in 1873. It has consultative status, as an international non-governmental organisation, with a number of the United Nations specialised agencies. The objectives of the International Law Association (Australian Branch) are to promote the study, elucidation and advancement of international law, public and private, the study of comparative law, the making of proposals for the solution of conflicts of law, and for the unification of law, and the furthering of international understanding and goodwill amongst persons of Australian citizenship and normally resident in Australia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afje.jpeg
AFJE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-law-association-australian-branch-.jpeg
International Law Association (Australian Branch)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AFJE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Law Association (Australian Branch)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFJE in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Law Association (Australian Branch) in 2025.

Incident History — AFJE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFJE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Law Association (Australian Branch) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Law Association (Australian Branch) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afje.jpeg
AFJE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-law-association-australian-branch-.jpeg
International Law Association (Australian Branch)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AFJE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Law Association (Australian Branch) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, International Law Association (Australian Branch) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AFJE company.

In the current year, International Law Association (Australian Branch) company and AFJE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither International Law Association (Australian Branch) company nor AFJE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither International Law Association (Australian Branch) company nor AFJE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither International Law Association (Australian Branch) company nor AFJE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AFJE company nor International Law Association (Australian Branch) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AFJE nor International Law Association (Australian Branch) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AFJE company nor International Law Association (Australian Branch) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AFJE company employs more people globally than International Law Association (Australian Branch) company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither AFJE nor International Law Association (Australian Branch) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AFJE nor International Law Association (Australian Branch) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AFJE nor International Law Association (Australian Branch) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AFJE nor International Law Association (Australian Branch) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AFJE nor International Law Association (Australian Branch) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AFJE nor International Law Association (Australian Branch) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X