Comparison Overview

AFI Branding

VS

Inprint Litho

AFI Branding

30 Beyer Rd, Braeside, Victoria, 3195, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17

AFI has rebranded to IVE and now forms part of its Brand Activations team. For all enquiries and orders, please give us a call on 1300 652 514. Follow IVE Group for the latest news and projects. AFI Branding are the leaders in fabric signage solutions for the retail, exhibitions and events sectors. With 20+ years of industry experience and as many years carving out new territory in the local market, AFI branding are still leading the industry in innovation and excellence. Beyond printing, AFI has made significant investments in cutting edge technology, which has kept many critical processes in-house resulting in a seamless end-to-end production process. Add to that our unwavering commitment to a 'can-do'​ attitude and you've got a combination that ensures a creative, cutting edge, quality product every time. Endless possibilities on fabric!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Inprint Litho

Unit 4, Southampton, Hampshire, SO15 4HU, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Over the past 25 years, Inprint has established itself as one of the South’s leading corporate printers, producing high quality printing, delivered on time. We have achieved this by continued investment in staff training and the very latest in cutting edge pre-press, printing and finishing technology. With over 30 employees working 6 days a week, we are able to offer an unbeatable service producing work to the highest standard whilst remaining competitive in the ever changing market place. Inprint are one of few printers to truly offer a one stop production solution. We offer a full service digital, Litho, large format, variable data production facility. From a simple 100 A5 leaflets, to a full exhibition banner system, to an outdoor 10m banner to having your invoices printed and sent directly to your client. Inprint produce all of these from our production facility in Southampton. Sourcing high quality printing within budget and a tight time frame can be challenging. It’s at times like this when your business needs an experienced, reliable and flexible print partner, with a full range of printed products who are committed to delivering quality print on budget and on time. Inprint has offered our clients just this – a flexible, reliable and cost effective design and one stop print service. We can offer an unbeatable combination of high calibre dedicated people supported by large capacity print machinery and a modern technology infrastructure. This capability combines with our flexible and personal approach to give you the ultimate professional print service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afi-branding.jpeg
AFI Branding
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inprint-litho.jpeg
Inprint Litho
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AFI Branding
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inprint Litho
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFI Branding in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inprint Litho in 2025.

Incident History — AFI Branding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFI Branding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inprint Litho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inprint Litho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afi-branding.jpeg
AFI Branding
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inprint-litho.jpeg
Inprint Litho
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Inprint Litho company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AFI Branding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Inprint Litho company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AFI Branding company.

In the current year, Inprint Litho company and AFI Branding company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Inprint Litho company nor AFI Branding company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Inprint Litho company nor AFI Branding company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inprint Litho company nor AFI Branding company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AFI Branding company nor Inprint Litho company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AFI Branding nor Inprint Litho holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AFI Branding company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Inprint Litho company.

Inprint Litho company employs more people globally than AFI Branding company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither AFI Branding nor Inprint Litho holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AFI Branding nor Inprint Litho holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AFI Branding nor Inprint Litho holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AFI Branding nor Inprint Litho holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AFI Branding nor Inprint Litho holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AFI Branding nor Inprint Litho holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L