Comparison Overview

EB3

VS

Advantage Utah

EB3

161 Wilbur Dr NE, North Canton, 44720, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We do 1 thing really well. We print very high quality booklets for a lot cheaper than the competition. We print 8.5 X 11 saddle stitched staples booklets on 80 lb glossy paper. We also include 2-3 day priority mail shipping costs in our rates to make things easier and more affordable for our customers. Finally, our turnaround time is 1-3 business days for printing. Give us a try - we know you'll be happy you did!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advantage Utah

None
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

For over 50 years the core of Advantage Utah services has been publishing. We began as Publishers Press in 1958 as a regional book printer servicing clients in several industries. Growth continued through the 60s and 70s providing publishers, retailers, and individual authors a way to get to press. In 1983 we started printing day planners for a small startup company, FranklinCovey. Over the next decade we continued with multiple publishers while managing the explosive growth by printing every day planner sold by FranklinCovey. In 1993 FranklinCovey acquired Publishers Press and we became FC Printing. It was business as usual with our once largest client, now new owner…along with all of our other accounts. In January of 2009, FC Printing along with Printech and Rocky Mountain Printing were acquired by Advantage Inc. to form Advantage Utah. All 3 companies now operate as 1 inside their new building at the Franklin Covey Campus. We continue to remain an industry leader in publishing, in addition to other commercial work. We invite you to visit and tour one of our state of-the-art facilities. You will understand why Advantage is a leader in the industry and why our customers continue to partner with us for their printing, mailing and marketing needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/affordablebookletprinting.jpeg
EB3
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advantage-utah.jpeg
Advantage Utah
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EB3
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advantage Utah
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EB3 in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advantage Utah in 2025.

Incident History — EB3 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EB3 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advantage Utah (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advantage Utah cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/affordablebookletprinting.jpeg
EB3
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advantage-utah.jpeg
Advantage Utah
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Advantage Utah company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EB3 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Advantage Utah company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EB3 company.

In the current year, Advantage Utah company and EB3 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Advantage Utah company nor EB3 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Advantage Utah company nor EB3 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Advantage Utah company nor EB3 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EB3 company nor Advantage Utah company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EB3 nor Advantage Utah holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EB3 company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Advantage Utah company.

Neither EB3 nor Advantage Utah holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EB3 nor Advantage Utah holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EB3 nor Advantage Utah holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EB3 nor Advantage Utah holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EB3 nor Advantage Utah holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EB3 nor Advantage Utah holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L