Comparison Overview

ST Engineering, Aethon

VS

ABI LTD

ST Engineering, Aethon

200 Business Center Dr, Pittsburgh, 15205, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

ST Engineering, Aethon provides mobile robotics solutions to the healthcare and hospitality markets. We engineer, sell and support solutions to automate the transportation of goods and supplies. Our products and designed and built in Pittsburgh, PA and our people are passionate about using robotic technology to automate material movement and delivery to improve efficiency, labor utilization and safety. With operations in the US and Asia, Aethon autonomous mobile robot makes over 5 million deliveries annually in customer facilities around the globe. We have been featured in Economist, The Wall Street Journal, Inc., CNBC, 60 Minutes and Fox News. Our parent company, ST Engineering, is based in Singapore.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ABI LTD

61 Performance Drive, Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA, L4S 0J5
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

ABI LTD is a global leader in the manufacturing of baking equipment. For more than 30 years, the company has developed high-calibre technologies for all stages of the baking process; from ingredients handling through to packaging. ABI manufactures stand-alone units for commercial bakeries and provides end-to-end system integrations for many of the world's largest industrial bakeries. The company boasts a network of satisfied customers from across the US, Canada, China, Germany, France, Singapore, South Korea, and the Caribbean.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 114
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aethon.jpeg
ST Engineering, Aethon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abi-ltd.jpeg
ABI LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ST Engineering, Aethon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABI LTD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ST Engineering, Aethon in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABI LTD in 2025.

Incident History — ST Engineering, Aethon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ST Engineering, Aethon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABI LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABI LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aethon.jpeg
ST Engineering, Aethon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abi-ltd.jpeg
ABI LTD
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ABI LTD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ST Engineering, Aethon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ABI LTD company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ST Engineering, Aethon company.

In the current year, ABI LTD company and ST Engineering, Aethon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ABI LTD company nor ST Engineering, Aethon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ABI LTD company nor ST Engineering, Aethon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ABI LTD company nor ST Engineering, Aethon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ST Engineering, Aethon company nor ABI LTD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ST Engineering, Aethon nor ABI LTD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ST Engineering, Aethon company nor ABI LTD company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ABI LTD company employs more people globally than ST Engineering, Aethon company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither ST Engineering, Aethon nor ABI LTD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ST Engineering, Aethon nor ABI LTD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ST Engineering, Aethon nor ABI LTD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ST Engineering, Aethon nor ABI LTD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ST Engineering, Aethon nor ABI LTD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ST Engineering, Aethon nor ABI LTD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H