Comparison Overview

Aeropuertos GAP

VS

Ethiopian Airlines

Aeropuertos GAP

Avenida Mariano Otero No. 1249-B Piso 6, Torre Pacífico, Rinconada del Bosque, , None, Guadalajara, , Jalisco , MX, C.P. 44530
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aeropuertosgap.com.mx

Somos una empresa mexicana que desarrolla su actividad en el sector aeroportuario. Operamos 12 aeropuertos internacionales en México y 2 en Jamaica, sirviendo en conjunto a más de 350 destinos, a través de 37 aerolíneas. En 2022, atendimos a 56.7 millones de pasajeros. Creemos en el valor de cada individuo y buscamos detonar su potencial por medio de la Fundación GAP integrada por los Colegios GAP y los Centros Comunitarios de Formación que ofrecen educación de calidad a familias de bajos recursos y oportunidades para elevar la calidad de vida a la comunidad aeroportuaria.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 782
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ethiopian Airlines

Bole International Airport, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, ET, 1755
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ethiopianairlines.com

Ethiopian Airlines Group (Ethiopian) is a true African success story, transforming a visionary dream into a globally renowned reality for nearly eight decades. Operating flights to more than 160 domestic and international passenger, and cargo destinations across five continents, Ethiopian bridges the gaps between Africa and the world. Emphasizing passenger comfort and environmental sustainability, Ethiopian utilizes ultra-modern aircraft such as Boeing 737s, 777s, 787s, Airbus A350-900, A350-1000, and De Havilland Q400. Ethiopian, the Star Alliance member airline since 2011, champions in various coveted awards including Skytrax’s ‘Best Airline in Africa Award’ for eight consecutive years, APEX ‘Best Overall in Africa’ award and ‘Leadership in Connecting Africa through Transport’ Award among others. Ethiopian aims to further excel in its success through a strategic plan dubbed ‘Vision 2035’ and become one of the top 20 most competitive and leading aviation groups in the world. Embracing a Pan-African spirit, Ethiopian is pursuing multi-hub strategy through hubs in Lomé, Togo with ASKY, in Lilongwe, Malawi with Malawi Airlines, in Lusaka, Zambia with Zambia Airways, and in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) with Air Congo.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 11,348
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeropuertosgap.jpeg
Aeropuertos GAP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ethiopian-airlines.jpeg
Ethiopian Airlines
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aeropuertos GAP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ethiopian Airlines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aeropuertos GAP in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ethiopian Airlines in 2025.

Incident History — Aeropuertos GAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aeropuertos GAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ethiopian Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ethiopian Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeropuertosgap.jpeg
Aeropuertos GAP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ethiopian-airlines.jpeg
Ethiopian Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aeropuertos GAP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ethiopian Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ethiopian Airlines company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aeropuertos GAP company.

In the current year, Ethiopian Airlines company and Aeropuertos GAP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ethiopian Airlines company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ethiopian Airlines company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ethiopian Airlines company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP company nor Ethiopian Airlines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor Ethiopian Airlines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP company nor Ethiopian Airlines company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ethiopian Airlines company employs more people globally than Aeropuertos GAP company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor Ethiopian Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor Ethiopian Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor Ethiopian Airlines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor Ethiopian Airlines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor Ethiopian Airlines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor Ethiopian Airlines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References