Comparison Overview

Aeropuertos GAP

VS

China Eastern Airlines, North America

Aeropuertos GAP

Avenida Mariano Otero No. 1249-B Piso 6, Torre Pacífico, Rinconada del Bosque, , None, Guadalajara, , Jalisco , MX, C.P. 44530
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Somos una empresa mexicana que desarrolla su actividad en el sector aeroportuario. Operamos 12 aeropuertos internacionales en México y 2 en Jamaica, sirviendo en conjunto a más de 350 destinos, a través de 37 aerolíneas. En 2022, atendimos a 56.7 millones de pasajeros. Creemos en el valor de cada individuo y buscamos detonar su potencial por medio de la Fundación GAP integrada por los Colegios GAP y los Centros Comunitarios de Formación que ofrecen educación de calidad a familias de bajos recursos y oportunidades para elevar la calidad de vida a la comunidad aeroportuaria.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 782
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

China Eastern Airlines, North America

Hongqiao International Airport Shanghai, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

As one of the three major air carriers in China, headquartered in Shanghai, China Eastern Airlines operates 111 domestic and overseas branches across the globe. Flying a fleet of 730 aircraft which is one of the youngest fleets in major airlines worldwide. Moreover, it boasts the largest-scale in-flight Wi-Fi wide-bodied fleet with leading commercial and technical models in China. The annual passenger turnover of CEA exceeds more than 130 million, ranking top 10 among global airlines As an official member of SkyTeam, China Eastern has extended its flight network from Shanghai to 1036 cities in 170 countries via close cooperation with alliance members. Frequent Flyer of Eastern Miles are privileged with 790 lounges worldwide within all 19 SkyTeam member airlines. China Eastern serves non-stop flights from Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Vancouver and Toronto to Shanghai, along with the comprehensive flight network covering more than 110 cities in China, connecting Asia, Europe and Oceania. Focusing on providing high-quality aviation transport service, China Eastern has won awards at home and abroad in the fields of operation quality, service experience, CSR, etc., including the Flight Safety Diamond Award by CAAC - the highest flight safety award in China, nine consecutive years of Top 50 Most Valuable Chinese Brands by the Brand Rating Agency WPP, four consecutive years’ nomination of “Global Top 500 Most Valuable Brand” by UK's Brand Rating Agency - Brand Finance, two consecutive years of Top 20 Chinese Enterprises Global Image Award-ranking first in the transportation industry. Additionally, China Eastern got the A rating in the latest ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) criteria and listed the first place along with other five airlines, according to global index compiler MSCI.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeropuertosgap.jpeg
Aeropuertos GAP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-eastern-airlines-north-america.jpeg
China Eastern Airlines, North America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aeropuertos GAP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
China Eastern Airlines, North America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aeropuertos GAP in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Eastern Airlines, North America in 2025.

Incident History — Aeropuertos GAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aeropuertos GAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — China Eastern Airlines, North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Eastern Airlines, North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeropuertosgap.jpeg
Aeropuertos GAP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-eastern-airlines-north-america.jpeg
China Eastern Airlines, North America
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China Eastern Airlines, North America company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aeropuertos GAP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, China Eastern Airlines, North America company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aeropuertos GAP company.

In the current year, China Eastern Airlines, North America company and Aeropuertos GAP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither China Eastern Airlines, North America company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither China Eastern Airlines, North America company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither China Eastern Airlines, North America company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP company nor China Eastern Airlines, North America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP company nor China Eastern Airlines, North America company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

China Eastern Airlines, North America company employs more people globally than Aeropuertos GAP company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N