Comparison Overview

AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group

VS

BTLawyers

AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group

11900 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, California, 90064, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Aerlex Law Group provides expert legal advice and strategic counsel in the complex field of business aviation. Over the past 12 years, the firm's accomplished attorneys and skilled aviation professionals have successfully managed more $4.3 billion in transactions involving every type of aircraft, from antique biplanes to helicopters to the latest generation of transcontinental business jets. Firm President Stephen Hofer and the Aerlex lawyers provide services across the entire spectrum of aviation law, including whole and fractional aircraft transactions, leasing, financing, operations and management, FAA and DOT regulatory compliance, and aviation-related corporate, real estate, employment and litigation matters. A tax specialist handles federal and state income tax audits, federal excise tax audits, sales and use tax exemptions, and property tax appeals. Join clients across the United States and in more than 30 countries around the world who have entrusted their aircraft issues to the Aerlex team. Whenever and wherever you need it, Aerlex delivers the best possible aviation law resources.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BTLawyers

Level 30, Brisbane, Queensland, 4003, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

BTLawyers is a progressive law firm of bold and brilliant thinkers. We represent insurers, businesses and government departments and act for many of Australia’s leading businesses providing quality solutions, service and commitment. BTLawyers was founded by Bruce Thomas in 2002. Having worked in big law firms, Bruce knew there was an opportunity to deliver a different, more personal experience for his clients – an experience based on trust, creative thinking, and cost certainty via a fixed fee pricing model. Over the last 18 years, our insurance and commercial litigation business has grown and developed. Our reach now goes well beyond Queensland to clients based in all states of Australia, with some of the most complex legal issues.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aerlex-law-group.jpeg
AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bruce-thomas-lawyers.jpeg
BTLawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BTLawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BTLawyers in 2025.

Incident History — AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BTLawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BTLawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aerlex-law-group.jpeg
AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bruce-thomas-lawyers.jpeg
BTLawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group company and BTLawyers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, BTLawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group company.

In the current year, BTLawyers company and AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BTLawyers company nor AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BTLawyers company nor AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BTLawyers company nor AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group company nor BTLawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group nor BTLawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group company nor BTLawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BTLawyers company employs more people globally than AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group nor BTLawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group nor BTLawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group nor BTLawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group nor BTLawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group nor BTLawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AERLEX | Aerlex Law Group nor BTLawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X