Comparison Overview

Advocacia Riedel

VS

Gatehouse Chambers

Advocacia Riedel

Brasília, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

A história da Advocacia Riedel está diretamente ligada a de seu fundador, Ulisses Riedel de Resende, um dos mais prestigiados advogados trabalhistas do país. Fundada no Rio de Janeiro em 1959, foi transferida para Brasília em 1971, acompanhando o Tribunal Superior do Trabalho (TST). Sua missão é atuar de forma ética e eficiente na defesa jurídica dos interesses da sociedade, fundamentados na valorização do trabalho e da dignidade humana. Atualmente localizada no 13º andar do Edifício Liberty Mall, a Riedel é referência do Direito Trabalhista no Distrito Federal. Foi responsável pela criação de 60 entidades sindicais e de sete confederações de trabalhadores. Com valores pautados na ética, respeito e conhecimento especializado, seu nome consta em um grande número de processos que tramitam no TST, resultado da credibilidade e do reconhecimento construídos ao longo dos 56 anos de atuação. A Advocacia Riedel se destaca pela excelência na atuação profissional e no atendimento ao cliente. Na última década, além de se especializar nas causas trabalhistas, a empresa ramificou suas atividades e passou também a atender outras áreas do Direito: Sindical, Médico, Constitucional, Cível, Tributário, Previdenciário, Administrativo e Penal. O escritório une tradição e alto desempenho. A inovação e a utilização de soluções tecnológicas estão presentes na gestão dos processos que são 100% digitalizados. Essa metodologia garante rapidez e assertividade no andamento de milhares de ações e no objetivo de levar justiça a todas as classes.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gatehouse Chambers

1 Lady Hale Gate, Gray's Inn, London, GB, WC1X 8BS
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Gatehouse Chambers is a leading commercial chambers which specialises in arbitration; commercial dispute resolution; construction and engineering; insolvency, restructuring and company; insurance; professional liability and property disputes. It also has niche specialisms in clinical negligence and personal injury as well as private client work. Handling both domestic and international work, Gatehouse Chambers is known for the quality of its members and client service as well as its innovative approach to issues such as funding. Our barristers are well known in their fields and are ranked in the latest issues of the leading independent legal directories Chambers UK and The Legal 500. We handle everything from informal advice over the telephone to representation in the most complex international disputes. We are at the forefront of alternative dispute resolution and have a panel of qualified arbitrators and mediators. The members of our Practice Management Team have many years of experience, enabling them to consider clients'​ individual needs when recommending barristers with a suitable level of skills and experience. They are also available to discuss any concerns during the course of the work. Expertise and excellent client care are at the heart of our service. We care about what our clients say and how they experience our service. We take relationships with our clients very seriously and are always looking for ways to improve the service we give. Gatehouse Chambers is a London Living Wage employer, has Investors in People Gold accreditation and has a long-established Corporate Social Responsibility track record and programme.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 166
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocacia-riedel.jpeg
Advocacia Riedel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gatehouse-chambers.jpeg
Gatehouse Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Advocacia Riedel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gatehouse Chambers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advocacia Riedel in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gatehouse Chambers in 2025.

Incident History — Advocacia Riedel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advocacia Riedel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gatehouse Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gatehouse Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocacia-riedel.jpeg
Advocacia Riedel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gatehouse-chambers.jpeg
Gatehouse Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gatehouse Chambers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advocacia Riedel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gatehouse Chambers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Advocacia Riedel company.

In the current year, Gatehouse Chambers company and Advocacia Riedel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gatehouse Chambers company nor Advocacia Riedel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gatehouse Chambers company nor Advocacia Riedel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gatehouse Chambers company nor Advocacia Riedel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Advocacia Riedel company nor Gatehouse Chambers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Advocacia Riedel nor Gatehouse Chambers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Advocacia Riedel company nor Gatehouse Chambers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gatehouse Chambers company employs more people globally than Advocacia Riedel company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Advocacia Riedel nor Gatehouse Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Advocacia Riedel nor Gatehouse Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Advocacia Riedel nor Gatehouse Chambers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Advocacia Riedel nor Gatehouse Chambers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Advocacia Riedel nor Gatehouse Chambers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Advocacia Riedel nor Gatehouse Chambers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X