Comparison Overview

Advise Image

VS

KT Designs

Advise Image

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.adviseimage.com

Advise Image … conveys an overall enhancement of a client’s image in the world of print and digital formats. We work with organizations … as well as with individual clients … to promote that image in the best light in all the print and digital mediums the client is currently immersed in … as well as the mediums they *should* be in. Graphic & Web Design | Media | Marketing | IT | Search Engine Optimization Search Engine Marketing | Reputation Management We brand with logos and iconography and advise “best practice” to be used across the brand. We lead in digital formats … website/landing page (design/development/maintenance), social media marketing (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.), e-mail marketing design (messaging and coding), and promote both SEM & SEO (marketing/consulting/paid search). We lead in print formats … marketing collateral design, marketing strategy, direct mail design, catalog design, print production, copywriting, and illustration. Specialties: Graphic Design, Web Design, Media, Marketing, Information Technology (IT), Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM), and Branding-and-Reputation Management.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

KT Designs

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ccacres.com

A fresh freelance graphic designer. Dedicated to new, innovative graphic styles. From logo design to print advertising. Equine photography and ad design. Also am proficient at photo re-touching, collage's and creating special memories. Affiliate member for the innovators of the "floater". The new ingenious way to display your photos, or photo creations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advise-image.jpeg
Advise Image
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kt-designs.jpeg
KT Designs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Advise Image
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KT Designs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advise Image in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KT Designs in 2025.

Incident History — Advise Image (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advise Image cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KT Designs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KT Designs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advise-image.jpeg
Advise Image
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kt-designs.jpeg
KT Designs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KT Designs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advise Image company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KT Designs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Advise Image company.

In the current year, KT Designs company and Advise Image company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KT Designs company nor Advise Image company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KT Designs company nor Advise Image company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KT Designs company nor Advise Image company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Advise Image company nor KT Designs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Advise Image nor KT Designs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Advise Image company nor KT Designs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Advise Image company employs more people globally than KT Designs company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Advise Image nor KT Designs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Advise Image nor KT Designs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Advise Image nor KT Designs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Advise Image nor KT Designs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Advise Image nor KT Designs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Advise Image nor KT Designs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References