Comparison Overview

Advantech USA

VS

Albo Computer Corp.

Advantech USA

13 Whatney, None, Irvine, California, US, 92618
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Advantech is the global leader of embedded, industrial, IoT and automation solution platforms. The 35-year-old, billion-dollar business is ranked a top 100 Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) company, with over 1,000 products and more than 8,000 employees working in 92 major cities worldwide. Advantech is renowned for developing and manufacturing high-quality, high-performance hardware and software computing components as well as complete platforms—focused on its vision of enabling an intelligent planet. Advantech is a subsidiary of Advantech Co., Ltd.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 196
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Albo Computer Corp.

undefined, Buffalo, NY, 14228, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Established in 2010, Albo Computer Corp. provides the highest quality computer hardware at the most competitive prices. We provide top of the line Dell Servers, Alienware Systems, Intel Processors, GPUs, Memory, HDDs, SSDs and many more products. Our company provides superior customer service, while also maintaining the latest technology with the best prices.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advantechusa.jpeg
Advantech USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albo-computer-corp.jpeg
Albo Computer Corp.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Advantech USA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Albo Computer Corp.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advantech USA in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Albo Computer Corp. in 2025.

Incident History — Advantech USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advantech USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Albo Computer Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Albo Computer Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advantechusa.jpeg
Advantech USA
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albo-computer-corp.jpeg
Albo Computer Corp.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Advantech USA company and Albo Computer Corp. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Advantech USA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Albo Computer Corp. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Albo Computer Corp. company and Advantech USA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Advantech USA company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Albo Computer Corp. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Albo Computer Corp. company nor Advantech USA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Albo Computer Corp. company nor Advantech USA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Advantech USA company nor Albo Computer Corp. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Advantech USA nor Albo Computer Corp. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Advantech USA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Albo Computer Corp. company.

Advantech USA company employs more people globally than Albo Computer Corp. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Advantech USA nor Albo Computer Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Advantech USA nor Albo Computer Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Advantech USA nor Albo Computer Corp. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Advantech USA nor Albo Computer Corp. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Advantech USA nor Albo Computer Corp. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Advantech USA nor Albo Computer Corp. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H