Comparison Overview

Advanet

VS

Duxbury Networking

Advanet

616-4, Tanaka, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0951, 700-0951, JP
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

Made in Japan の高品質を、岡山から世界へ。そして未来へ 国内生産の高品質な各種産業用ボードコンピュータ及び、ファームウェア開発などで、半導体、交通インフラ、医療、通信などの高い信頼性が要求される産業分野に製品をご提供しています。 Advanet Inc. is a leading provider of industrial embedded board computers and systems consistently designed, developed, and manufactured in Japan. Our products have been deployed in various industrial fields such as semiconductor, transportation infrastructure, medical, and communication where high reliability is required. Advanet is a member of the Eurotech Group, one of the top ten international players in the embedded computers market with a true global footprint covering three continents, from Asia to Europe to North America. Being part of Eurotech, Advanet can leverage on a worldwide sales structure to market its portfolio of high-end embedded computers for real time control of equipment and systems. At the same time, Advanet represents a major pillar for Eurotech´s business in Asia.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Duxbury Networking

Block 2, Riviera Office Park, Johannesburg, 2000, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Duxbury Networking has been at the forefront of specialised networking distribution for over four decades. We go beyond traditional distribution by offering channel partners and their customers a comprehensive suite of technical solutions. What distinguishes us in today’s competitive landscape is our value-added technical services and expert support. Our carefully curated product portfolio spans Networking, Wireless, Integrated Surveillance, and Cybersecurity Solutions. We aim to cultivate strong partnerships with our clients, who regard us as reliable, trusted advisors ready to exceed expectations and seamlessly integrate with their operations.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 153
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advanet.jpeg
Advanet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duxbury-networking.jpeg
Duxbury Networking
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Advanet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Duxbury Networking
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advanet in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Duxbury Networking in 2025.

Incident History — Advanet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advanet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Duxbury Networking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Duxbury Networking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advanet.jpeg
Advanet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duxbury-networking.jpeg
Duxbury Networking
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Advanet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Duxbury Networking company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Duxbury Networking company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Advanet company.

In the current year, Duxbury Networking company and Advanet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Duxbury Networking company nor Advanet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Duxbury Networking company nor Advanet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Duxbury Networking company nor Advanet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Advanet company nor Duxbury Networking company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Advanet nor Duxbury Networking holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Advanet company nor Duxbury Networking company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Duxbury Networking company employs more people globally than Advanet company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Advanet nor Duxbury Networking holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Advanet nor Duxbury Networking holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Advanet nor Duxbury Networking holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Advanet nor Duxbury Networking holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Advanet nor Duxbury Networking holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Advanet nor Duxbury Networking holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.