Comparison Overview

Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc.

VS

PRINTSECURE

Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc.

3300 E Ponce de Leon Ave, Scottdale, Georgia, 30079, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Our core competence revolves around understanding not only how to make a label look good but to function in many different types of environments. In addition, we carry a great many specialty materials and adhesives to satisfy those objectives. Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. (ABLT) is a versatile printing operation that can create very complex labels. As an innovative leader in labeling and data collection technology, ABLT has provided products and services to customers around the world since 1984. We are focused almost exclusively on the industrial market. This provides ABLT an extensive level of experience and unparalleled expertise, which translates into a tremendous value to our clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PRINTSECURE

Avenue Mghira Lot 143 Z.I Mghira 3, Fouchena -Ben Arous, 2082, TN
Last Update: 2025-12-17

PRINTSECURE est une des entreprises leader dans la fabrication de tous types de carte (à gratter, SIM, Identité, Santé, Paiement, fidélité, RFID, Bande Magnétique, Jeux, etc…) et dans la mise en œuvre de prestation pouvant y être rattaché telles que le packaging. Elle offre également une multitude de services à valeur ajoutée liés au domaine de la carte. La société, basée à Tunis (carrefour entre l’Afrique, le Moyen Orient et l’Europe) dispose pour ce faire d’un centre de production moderne autonome et hautement sécurisé garantissant la maîtrise de l’ensemble de ses réalisations sous le signe d’une qualité indéniable et le respect des exigences de nos partenaires. PRINTSECURE s’engage à toujours présenter un produit attractif possédant les meilleurs atouts technologiques.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advanced-barcode-&-label-technologies-inc-.jpeg
Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printsecure.jpeg
PRINTSECURE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PRINTSECURE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PRINTSECURE in 2025.

Incident History — Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PRINTSECURE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PRINTSECURE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advanced-barcode-&-label-technologies-inc-.jpeg
Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printsecure.jpeg
PRINTSECURE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PRINTSECURE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PRINTSECURE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. company.

In the current year, PRINTSECURE company and Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PRINTSECURE company nor Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PRINTSECURE company nor Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PRINTSECURE company nor Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. company nor PRINTSECURE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. nor PRINTSECURE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. company nor PRINTSECURE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PRINTSECURE company employs more people globally than Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. nor PRINTSECURE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. nor PRINTSECURE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. nor PRINTSECURE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. nor PRINTSECURE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. nor PRINTSECURE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Advanced Barcode & Label Technologies, Inc. nor PRINTSECURE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N