Comparison Overview

Adobe Commerce

VS

Cimpress

Adobe Commerce

345 Park Ave, None, San Jose, California, US, 95110
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Adobe Commerce is the world’s leading digital commerce solution for merchants and brands. With Adobe Commerce, you can build engaging shopping experiences for every type of customer — from B2B and B2C to B2B2C. It’s built for enterprise on a scalable, open-source platform with unparalleled security, premium performance, and a low total cost of ownership. Businesses of all sizes can use it to reach customers wherever they are, across devices and marketplaces. It’s more than a flexible shopping cart system. It’s the building block for business growth.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 533
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Cimpress

Xerox Technology Park, Dundalk, County Louth, A91 H9N9, IE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Cimpress plc (Nasdaq: CMPR) invests in and builds customer-focused, entrepreneurial, mass-customization businesses for the long term. Mass customization is a competitive strategy which seeks to produce goods and services to meet individual customer needs with near mass production efficiency. Cimpress is a strategically-focused group of more than a dozen businesses, each operating in a largely autonomous manner other than as it relates to the select few shared strategic and corporate activities that we maintain centrally. Cimpress businesses include Drukwerkdeal, Exaprint, National Pen, Pixartprinting, Printi, Vistaprint and WIRmachenDRUCK. Founded by Robert Keane, who remains President & CEO today, the company has been passionate about empowering people to make an impression through individually meaningful, personalized physical products for more than 20 years. To learn more, visit http://www.cimpress.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,485
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adobe-commerce.jpeg
Adobe Commerce
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cimpress.jpeg
Cimpress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Adobe Commerce
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cimpress
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

Adobe Commerce has 279.75% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cimpress in 2025.

Incident History — Adobe Commerce (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adobe Commerce cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cimpress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cimpress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adobe-commerce.jpeg
Adobe Commerce
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network-Based, Exploitation of Public-Facing Application
Motivation: Opportunistic, Financial Gain (Potential), Data Theft (Potential), Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network-Based, Exploitation of Public-Facing Application (CVE-2025-54236), REST API Abuse
Motivation: Opportunistic, Financial Gain (Potential), Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network, REST API Exploitation, Session Forging
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cimpress.jpeg
Cimpress
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cimpress company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Adobe Commerce company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Adobe Commerce company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cimpress company has not reported any.

In the current year, Adobe Commerce company has reported more cyber incidents than Cimpress company.

Neither Cimpress company nor Adobe Commerce company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cimpress company nor Adobe Commerce company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cimpress company nor Adobe Commerce company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Adobe Commerce company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Cimpress company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Adobe Commerce nor Cimpress holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cimpress company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Adobe Commerce company.

Cimpress company employs more people globally than Adobe Commerce company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Adobe Commerce nor Cimpress holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Adobe Commerce nor Cimpress holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Adobe Commerce nor Cimpress holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Adobe Commerce nor Cimpress holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Adobe Commerce nor Cimpress holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Adobe Commerce nor Cimpress holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H