Comparison Overview

ADNOC Gas

VS

Complexul Energetic Oltenia

ADNOC Gas

Al Bild St 14, Entrance 1, Al Danah, Abu Dhabi Emirate, AE, 22202
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

ADNOC Gas is one of the world’s largest integrated gas companies operating an unmatched asset base that supplies around 60% of the UAE’s natural gas requirements and serves customers in more than 20 countries. ADNOC Gas is a subsidiary of ADNOC, one of the world's largest integrated energy companies. As a leading global gas player with access to capacity of around 10 billion standard cubic feet of gas per day (bscfd), we serve a wide range of domestic and international customers with an expanding portfolio of products. We supply around 60% of the UAE’s gas needs and export natural gas and related products to a diverse customer base in over 20 countries.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 1,310
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Complexul Energetic Oltenia

A.I. Cuza Street, no. 5 Targu-Jiu, Gorj 210006, RO
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

CE Oltenia is the sole lignite producer in Romania and one of the major players in the energy services sector in Romania, set-up on 31 May 2012 following a decision of the Romanian Government for the reorganization of the energy sector through a merger between a national lignite company (Societatea Nationala a Lignitului Oltenia) and three energy producing companies (Complexul Energetic Rovinari, Complexul Energetic Turceni and Complexul Energetic Craiova). CE Oltenia has an installed production capacity of 3900 MWh and the sales of electricity are made on the wholesale energy market – bilateral agreements market, next day market, balance market, technological system services market, en detail market and green certificates market. The Company also produces thermal energy – mainly for the city of Craiova and sales coal to third parties, mainly electricity producers. The main raw material used for the production of electricity is lignite extracted from Oltenia basin.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adnocgas.jpeg
ADNOC Gas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/complexul-energetic-oltenia.jpeg
Complexul Energetic Oltenia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ADNOC Gas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Complexul Energetic Oltenia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ADNOC Gas in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Complexul Energetic Oltenia in 2025.

Incident History — ADNOC Gas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ADNOC Gas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Complexul Energetic Oltenia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Complexul Energetic Oltenia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adnocgas.jpeg
ADNOC Gas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/complexul-energetic-oltenia.jpeg
Complexul Energetic Oltenia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ADNOC Gas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Complexul Energetic Oltenia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Complexul Energetic Oltenia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ADNOC Gas company.

In the current year, Complexul Energetic Oltenia company and ADNOC Gas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Complexul Energetic Oltenia company nor ADNOC Gas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Complexul Energetic Oltenia company nor ADNOC Gas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Complexul Energetic Oltenia company nor ADNOC Gas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ADNOC Gas company nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ADNOC Gas nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ADNOC Gas company nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Complexul Energetic Oltenia company employs more people globally than ADNOC Gas company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither ADNOC Gas nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ADNOC Gas nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ADNOC Gas nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ADNOC Gas nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ADNOC Gas nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ADNOC Gas nor Complexul Energetic Oltenia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H