Comparison Overview

Admark Graphics

VS

RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions

Admark Graphics

9700 Metromont Industrial Blvd, Charlotte, 28269, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.admarkgraphics.com

Founded in 1981, Admark has made the quantum leap from a local manufacturer of basic truck decals to a custom, high-end graphic design and commercial four-color process, digital & screen printing company capable of printing on almost any substrate. Admark has emerged as one of the industry leaders in fleet graphics and a strong contender in the Original Equipment Manufacturer's (OEM) and Point of Purchase (POP) graphics. Complimenting Admark's printing ability, we also have expert application teams that can install graphics all over the country for our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions

7120 Airport Highway, Pennsauken, NJ, 08109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.royercomm.com

RoyerComm was founded over fifty years ago with a belief that if you work hard and have a passion to learn you will always be successful. Because of this, as print technology has evolved, we have evolved. As new emerging ideas have come to our industry, we have embraced them. It has allowed us to stay passionate about what we do and bring our years of experience to each and every project we work on. It’s important to us that our clients have access to the many options available today. We offer a full suite of print and marketing services, which go well beyond print alone. For more information on any of our services, please give us a call to find out more. Some of our specialties include: Offset Printing Digital Printing Marketing Portals Large Format Printing Trade Show Displays Promotional Products Bindery & Finishing Mailing & Fulfillment

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/admark-graphic-systems.jpeg
Admark Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royercomm-group.jpeg
RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Admark Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Admark Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions in 2025.

Incident History — Admark Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Admark Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/admark-graphic-systems.jpeg
Admark Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royercomm-group.jpeg
RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Admark Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Admark Graphics company.

In the current year, RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions company and Admark Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions company nor Admark Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions company nor Admark Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions company nor Admark Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Admark Graphics company nor RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Admark Graphics nor RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Admark Graphics company nor RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Admark Graphics company employs more people globally than RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Admark Graphics nor RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Admark Graphics nor RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Admark Graphics nor RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Admark Graphics nor RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Admark Graphics nor RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Admark Graphics nor RoyerComm - Graphic Expressions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References