Comparison Overview

Adjacency Partners

VS

Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv

Adjacency Partners

107 SE Washington St., Portland, Oregon, 97214, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

WE BUILD BRIDGES. We sit at the intersection of ideas, opportunities, and relationships. At Adjacency Partners it's about people, trust, collaboration, teams, experimenting with ideas, and growing our partner's business, together. When an ecosystem thrives, it means that the people have developed patterns of behavior – or culture – that streamline the flow of ideas, talent, and capital. That's tomorrow's advisory at the purest level. That's what we push ourselves to be.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The GGTC Kyiv brings together representatives from various sectors, including government, business, civil society, and academia, to discuss and collaborate on digital reforms, share Ukraine's best GovTech practices, and generate impactful solutions for digital governance. In partnership with the Forum’s Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution Network and its affiliate, GGTC Berlin, the GovTech Centre in Kyiv will launch a platform to showcase Ukraine’s GovTech achievements and foster cooperation between global governance bodies and communities. By leveraging technologies such as AI, IoT, and blockchain, with a strong focus on cybersecurity, the Kyiv Centre will cultivate an innovation ecosystem with both local and global impact. [email protected]

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adjacencypartners.jpeg
Adjacency Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-government-technology-centre-kyiv.jpeg
Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Adjacency Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adjacency Partners in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv in 2025.

Incident History — Adjacency Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adjacency Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adjacencypartners.jpeg
Adjacency Partners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-government-technology-centre-kyiv.jpeg
Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Adjacency Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Adjacency Partners company.

In the current year, Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv company and Adjacency Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv company nor Adjacency Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv company nor Adjacency Partners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv company nor Adjacency Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Adjacency Partners company nor Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Adjacency Partners nor Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Adjacency Partners company nor Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv company employs more people globally than Adjacency Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Adjacency Partners nor Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Adjacency Partners nor Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Adjacency Partners nor Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Adjacency Partners nor Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Adjacency Partners nor Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Adjacency Partners nor Global Government Technology Centre Kyiv holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X