Comparison Overview

Addictions Care Center of Albany

VS

Great Basin Behavioral Health

Addictions Care Center of Albany

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Since 1967, ACCA has been a part of the community, strengthening the lives and improving the futures of thousands of individuals. Through intensive, proactive programs customized to individual needs, The Addictions Care Center of Albany touches the lives of more than 8,000 people throughout the Capital Region each year. ACCA offers the broadest continuum of addictions care in the Capital Region and is a leader in best practices for addictions treatment and prevention. Several of ACCA’s award-winning prevention programs have been distributed nationally and are utilized across the country to educate and equip school children with the knowledge to prevent addiction and live healthy and productive lives. ACCA’s programs are recognized nationally as solid evidence-based models with exceptional rates of success in treatment and prevention. ACCA’s continuum of care includes the following treatment and prevention programs: Treatment Programs *Community Residence Programs *Outpatient Programs Prevention Programs *Prevention Education Programs *Professional Development and Training Programs ACCA is unique in its philosophy and focus on the individual needs of each person served, integrated compassion and care, respect for diversity, and distinctive approach to group and individual counseling. ACCA is licensed by the New York State Office of Alcohol and Substance Abuse (OASAS) which provides ongoing regulatory oversight.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Great Basin Behavioral Health

695 Sierra Rose Dr, Reno, Nevada, 89511, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Great Basin Behavioral Health is an outpatient behavioral health organization that caters to the greater Reno/Tahoe region and offers individual, family and group based therapeutic services. Our clinical focus is holistic and involves the entire person, targeting both the body and the psyche, as one cannot have true balance, health, and life satisfaction without addressing both! We work with children, adolescents and adults both in and out of the office environment. Our agency is committed to using empirically valid treatment and our practitioners are highly trained in the areas of CBT, DBT, prolonged exposure, EFT and other treatment modalities in an effort to address conditions such as anxiety disorders, trauma, depression, behavioral problems with children, communication struggles in families and couples, as well as substance related treatment.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/addictions-care-center-of-albany.jpeg
Addictions Care Center of Albany
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-basin-behavioral-health-and-wellness.jpeg
Great Basin Behavioral Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Addictions Care Center of Albany
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Great Basin Behavioral Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Addictions Care Center of Albany in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Basin Behavioral Health in 2026.

Incident History — Addictions Care Center of Albany (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Addictions Care Center of Albany cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Great Basin Behavioral Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Basin Behavioral Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/addictions-care-center-of-albany.jpeg
Addictions Care Center of Albany
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-basin-behavioral-health-and-wellness.jpeg
Great Basin Behavioral Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Addictions Care Center of Albany company and Great Basin Behavioral Health company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Great Basin Behavioral Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Addictions Care Center of Albany company.

In the current year, Great Basin Behavioral Health company and Addictions Care Center of Albany company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Great Basin Behavioral Health company nor Addictions Care Center of Albany company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Great Basin Behavioral Health company nor Addictions Care Center of Albany company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Great Basin Behavioral Health company nor Addictions Care Center of Albany company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Addictions Care Center of Albany company nor Great Basin Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Addictions Care Center of Albany nor Great Basin Behavioral Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Addictions Care Center of Albany company nor Great Basin Behavioral Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Addictions Care Center of Albany company employs more people globally than Great Basin Behavioral Health company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Addictions Care Center of Albany nor Great Basin Behavioral Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Addictions Care Center of Albany nor Great Basin Behavioral Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Addictions Care Center of Albany nor Great Basin Behavioral Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Addictions Care Center of Albany nor Great Basin Behavioral Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Addictions Care Center of Albany nor Great Basin Behavioral Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Addictions Care Center of Albany nor Great Basin Behavioral Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N