Comparison Overview

Addiction Recovery Network

VS

Individual and Relationship Therapy Center

Addiction Recovery Network

100 Queen St West, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1S6, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Addiction Recovery Network is a North American Addiction Recovery organization that was designed to help those affected by addiction and in need of quality private Drug Rehab services. We have amassed years of experience in evidence based Addiction Treatment experience to design some of the best solutions for the recovery from the devastation of Addictions. We at the Addiction Recovery Network feel that addiction and alcoholism are the symptoms of underlying mental conditions brought about by concurrent disorders. Like all other mental disorders, they require the assistance of a specially trained team of medical and therapeutic professionals. This is precisely what we provide at the Addiction Recovery Network. Our primary purpose is that we are here to help: to answer your questions, to make information available, and most importantly, to ensure that only the best Addiction treatment is available for those who seek it.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Individual and Relationship Therapy Center

425 S. Cherry St. , Denver, 80246, US
Last Update:

Individual and Relationship Therapy Center (IRTC) is a highly regarded group psychotherapy practice located in the Cherry Creek area of Denver, Colorado. Founded by Laura Cross in 2013, IRTC consists of seven highly trained therapists who provide effective and compassionate counseling for couples, families and individuals. We specialize in helping our clients heal and improve their relationships with the people who matter most in their life. We welcome all people and all types of relationships, regardless of age, race, gender, orientation or culture. Our Values and Principles: It takes courage to get started with couples counseling, individual therapy, or family therapy. Sharing private thoughts with a stranger can be anxiety provoking. We respect and honor how difficult this can be and are highly trained to create an inviting environment. Our work is guided by several important values and principles that we feel contribute to the strong, trusting and respectful connections our clients form with our therapists right from the start. These principles are: respect, kindness, skill, safety and connection.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/addiction-recovery-network.jpeg
Addiction Recovery Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/individual-and-relationship-therapy-center.jpeg
Individual and Relationship Therapy Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Addiction Recovery Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Individual and Relationship Therapy Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Addiction Recovery Network in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Individual and Relationship Therapy Center in 2026.

Incident History — Addiction Recovery Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Addiction Recovery Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Individual and Relationship Therapy Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Individual and Relationship Therapy Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/addiction-recovery-network.jpeg
Addiction Recovery Network
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/individual-and-relationship-therapy-center.jpeg
Individual and Relationship Therapy Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Addiction Recovery Network company and Individual and Relationship Therapy Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Individual and Relationship Therapy Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Addiction Recovery Network company.

In the current year, Individual and Relationship Therapy Center company and Addiction Recovery Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Individual and Relationship Therapy Center company nor Addiction Recovery Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Individual and Relationship Therapy Center company nor Addiction Recovery Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Individual and Relationship Therapy Center company nor Addiction Recovery Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Addiction Recovery Network company nor Individual and Relationship Therapy Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Addiction Recovery Network nor Individual and Relationship Therapy Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Addiction Recovery Network company nor Individual and Relationship Therapy Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Addiction Recovery Network company employs more people globally than Individual and Relationship Therapy Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Addiction Recovery Network nor Individual and Relationship Therapy Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Addiction Recovery Network nor Individual and Relationship Therapy Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Addiction Recovery Network nor Individual and Relationship Therapy Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Addiction Recovery Network nor Individual and Relationship Therapy Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Addiction Recovery Network nor Individual and Relationship Therapy Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Addiction Recovery Network nor Individual and Relationship Therapy Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N