Comparison Overview

AdaptHealth

VS

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

AdaptHealth

Conshohocken, 19428, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

AdaptHealth is a network of full-service medical equipment companies that use tailored products and services to empower patients to live their best lives – out of the hospital and in their homes. With more than 670 locations across 47 states, AdaptHealth offers a breadth of clinically focused products and services to help patients with daily activities of life including respiratory health, sleep health, diabetes health, and wellness at home.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 3,210
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

1275 York Avenue, New York, 10065, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

The people of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) are united by a singular mission: ending cancer for life. Our specialized care teams provide personalized, compassionate, expert care to patients of all ages. Informed by basic research done at our Sloan Kettering Institute, scientists across MSK collaborate to conduct innovative translational and clinical research that is driving a revolution in our understanding of cancer as a disease and improving the ability to prevent, diagnose, and treat it. MSK is dedicated to training the next generation of scientists and clinicians, who go on to pursue our mission at MSK and around the globe. One of the world’s most respected comprehensive centers devoted exclusively to cancer, we have been recognized as one of the top two cancer hospitals in the country by U.S. News & World Report for more than 30 years.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,500
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adapthealth.jpeg
AdaptHealth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AdaptHealth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AdaptHealth in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in 2026.

Incident History — AdaptHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AdaptHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adapthealth.jpeg
AdaptHealth
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized system access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AdaptHealth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AdaptHealth company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company and AdaptHealth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company nor AdaptHealth company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

AdaptHealth company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company nor AdaptHealth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AdaptHealth company nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AdaptHealth nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AdaptHealth company.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company employs more people globally than AdaptHealth company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither AdaptHealth nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AdaptHealth nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AdaptHealth nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AdaptHealth nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AdaptHealth nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AdaptHealth nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N