Comparison Overview

Adams

VS

Hapa AG

Adams

904 S 20th St, Tampa, Florida, 33605, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1960, Adams Air & Hydraulics has grown, not only in reputation as being a leader in fluid power, pneumatic and hydraulic components, but to being the trusted partner for providing high end robotic and vision solutions. As our expertise and product portfolio grew, we were left with a name that is key to who we are, but not a name that encompassed all of our strengths. Due to that, the decision was made to re-brand in 2018. Welcome to Adams​, formerly Adams Air & Hydraulics, a family run business, that has excelled in knowledge and product excellence over the last 60 years. Even with all our growth, our mission stays constant - to strengthen American manufacturing by increasing our customer’s competitiveness in the global marketplace through increased productivity and profitability. Our vision is to be the leading resource in the state of Florida for innovative, sustainable design and successful application implementation from components to complete machine control. Our team of strategically located fluid power and automation specialists can work as an extension of your engineering and maintenance teams to assist in achieving your plant productivity goals. Our resources are your resources. Challenge us to find more PROFIT in your business!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 385
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hapa AG

Chriesbaumstrasse 4, Volketswil, undefined, 8604, CH
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Hapa AG, founded in 1933, is the world’s leading provider of late-stage-customization and on-demand printing solutions for packaging processes in the pharmaceutical and healthcare industry. The in-house printing solutions developed and produced by Hapa allow a lean production and create added value for packaging processes. Hapa, based in Volketswil near Zurich and completed with its own sales and service offices all over the world belongs to Coesia, a group of innovation-based industrial and packaging solutions companies operating globally, headquartered in Bologna Italy.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 162
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adamscorp.jpeg
Adams
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapa-ag.jpeg
Hapa AG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Adams
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hapa AG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adams in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapa AG in 2025.

Incident History — Adams (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adams cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hapa AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapa AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adamscorp.jpeg
Adams
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapa-ag.jpeg
Hapa AG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Adams company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hapa AG company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hapa AG company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Adams company.

In the current year, Hapa AG company and Adams company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hapa AG company nor Adams company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hapa AG company nor Adams company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hapa AG company nor Adams company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Adams company nor Hapa AG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Adams nor Hapa AG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hapa AG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Adams company.

Adams company employs more people globally than Hapa AG company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Adams nor Hapa AG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Adams nor Hapa AG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Adams nor Hapa AG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Adams nor Hapa AG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Adams nor Hapa AG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Adams nor Hapa AG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H