Comparison Overview

Adams Press

VS

Scidoc Publishers

Adams Press

7700 North Eastlake Terrace, Chicago, IIL, 60626, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Since 1942 Adams Press has produced books for for-profit and not-for-profit corporations, professional associations, and small presses and for independent authors who choose to self-publish. Adams Press produces high-quality, reasonably priced, hardcover, paperback, and electronic books customized to meet the business, professional, academic, or marketing goals of each individual we serve. We provide both editorial and visual clarity and organization to your vision and provide you with a book that meets your needs and makes you proud. We rely on more than 20 years of hands-on experience in the field of publishing, and we offer personal attention based on the values of integrity, confidentiality, and honesty espoused by our family-owned business. Adams Press is, and has always been, a family-owned and family-operated company. See also: http://www.linkedin.com/in/AdamsPress http://linkedin.com/in/TomKepler http://linkedin.com/in/AnnKepler

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scidoc Publishers

16192 Coastal Highway, Lewes, 19958, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

SciDoc Publications was established in 2012 with sole motive to disseminate knowledge amongst the scientific community. We as an Open Access publisher are on the way to be the world leader in the provision of STM (Science, Technology and Medicine) Open Access content. This publishing model allows us to reach millions of readers and give them access to scientific publications online free of charge. Through Open Access we intend to remove all barriers that traditional publishing models imposed. Keeping up to the pace of the 21st century and the vast global research scenario, we ensure accelerated distribution of new developments to the entire scientific community.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adams-press.jpeg
Adams Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scidoc-publishers.jpeg
Scidoc Publishers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Adams Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scidoc Publishers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adams Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scidoc Publishers in 2025.

Incident History — Adams Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adams Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scidoc Publishers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scidoc Publishers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adams-press.jpeg
Adams Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scidoc-publishers.jpeg
Scidoc Publishers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Adams Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Scidoc Publishers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scidoc Publishers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Adams Press company.

In the current year, Scidoc Publishers company and Adams Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scidoc Publishers company nor Adams Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scidoc Publishers company nor Adams Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scidoc Publishers company nor Adams Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Adams Press company nor Scidoc Publishers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Adams Press nor Scidoc Publishers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Adams Press company nor Scidoc Publishers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scidoc Publishers company employs more people globally than Adams Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Adams Press nor Scidoc Publishers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Adams Press nor Scidoc Publishers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Adams Press nor Scidoc Publishers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Adams Press nor Scidoc Publishers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Adams Press nor Scidoc Publishers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Adams Press nor Scidoc Publishers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.