Comparison Overview

Adam's Apples Foundation

VS

CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC

Adam's Apples Foundation

3702 W 10 Ave, Vancouver, V6R 2G4, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Adam’s Apples Foundation is a non-profit organization established to address and prevent mental health issues facing youth today. Adam's Apples Foundation facilitates connection and mental health literacy programming in our schools by encouraging interpersonal communication, understanding, and education among elementary and high-school students through four programs: the Apple Program, the Core Connector Initiative, Adam's Apples Youth Council, and our Scholarship Program. What began in 2016 with a single bowl of apples strategically placed within a school to offer students a healthy snack quickly evolved to become a key gathering place for students to connect, socialize, and converse. It was from this ‘seed’ that the Apple Program grew, now in 30 schools in the Lower Mainland. Apple Bowls are filled daily and students are encouraged to “take two” – one for themselves, and one for a friend, and start a conversation. This simple concept facilitates face-to-face connection in a tech-driven world where youth are more disconnected than ever, facilitating a safe and inclusive space for youth to feel supported by their peers and create meaningful connections. From this seed has grown comprehensive programming that holds the Apple Program at its core, while expanding to a mental health literacy program, the Core Connector Initiative (CCI), developed in partnership with the University of British Columbia. The module-based program is designed to help students gain mental health knowledge and peer support competencies. Today, with a passionate and respected team of educators, healthcare professionals, and business leaders, Adam’s Apples Foundation operates in 30 schools and community centres in Burnaby, Delta, Richmond, Surrey, and Vancouver, with demand to expand the program in BC. AAF’s mission – Connecting Youth One Conversation at a Time – resonates at all levels.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC

7646 Standish Place, Derwood, 20855, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Centers for Behavioral Health, LLC (Centers) offers Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services, Outreach Services, and Supported Living services in Rockville and Baltimore, Maryland. The main goal of our program is to create a supportive environment for recovery and wellness and serve as a liaison and advocate for all persons served. Our staff are dedicated to helping individuals understand their illness and manage their symptoms and to live life to the fullest potential while remaining in the community. Centers for Behavioral Health, LLC is fully invested in providing programs and services geared to the people we serve. Our behavioral health solutions are built on 55+ years of commitment to quality, accessibility and compassionate support. That commitment never ends.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adams-apples-foundation.jpeg
Adam's Apples Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centers-for-behavioral-health-llc.jpeg
CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Adam's Apples Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adam's Apples Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC in 2026.

Incident History — Adam's Apples Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adam's Apples Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adams-apples-foundation.jpeg
Adam's Apples Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centers-for-behavioral-health-llc.jpeg
CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Adam's Apples Foundation company and CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Adam's Apples Foundation company.

In the current year, CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC company and Adam's Apples Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC company nor Adam's Apples Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC company nor Adam's Apples Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC company nor Adam's Apples Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Adam's Apples Foundation company nor CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Adam's Apples Foundation nor CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Adam's Apples Foundation company nor CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC company employs more people globally than Adam's Apples Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Adam's Apples Foundation nor CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Adam's Apples Foundation nor CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Adam's Apples Foundation nor CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Adam's Apples Foundation nor CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Adam's Apples Foundation nor CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Adam's Apples Foundation nor CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N