Comparison Overview

Adams & Remers

VS

One-Red LLC

Adams & Remers

Adams & Remers LLP, Lewes, Sussex, BN7 2NN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Adams & Remers is a long-established firm based in Lewes in Sussex, and Holborn in London, with a large client base across our four practice areas: Residential and Commercial Property Private Client Commercial and Property Litigation Corporate & Commercial Employment Family We are ranked very highly in peer and client reviewed directories such as Chambers UK, Chambers High Net Worth, Legal 500 and Spears. We help businesses and private clients, both in the UK and internationally, with a broad range of issues - from AIM listings to property transactions. We also have sector specialisms in: Hotels & Leisure Care Homes and Pharmacies Viticulture Listed Property

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

One-Red LLC

undefined, Campbell, CA, 95008, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

One-Red LLC was a company formed by Koninklijke Philips N.V. ("Philips”), LG Electronics, Inc. ("LGE”), Pioneer Corporation ("Pioneer”) and Sony Corporation ("Sony”). As of July 1, 2012, One-Red offered joint patent licenses on behalf of LGE, Philips, Pioneer and Sony for DVD disc and player products. As of October 15, 2012, One-Red offered joint patent licenses for DVD software products. One-Red’s patent license programs were designed to help provide inventors with a return on their investment in research and product development and to give licensees access to technologies necessary for products that they manufacture and sell. One-Red aimed to promote a level playing field for its licensees through market education measures, compliance management, and intellectual property enforcement activities to encourage trade in properly licensed products. One-Red was created in 2011 and was most recently based in Campbell, California. Following the expiration of DVD patents in many countries One-Red terminated its licensing operations and is no longer in business. The company was dissolved on March 27th, 2020.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adams-&-remers.jpeg
Adams & Remers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-red-llc.jpeg
One-Red LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Adams & Remers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
One-Red LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adams & Remers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for One-Red LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Adams & Remers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adams & Remers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — One-Red LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

One-Red LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adams-&-remers.jpeg
Adams & Remers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-red-llc.jpeg
One-Red LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Adams & Remers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to One-Red LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, One-Red LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Adams & Remers company.

In the current year, One-Red LLC company and Adams & Remers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither One-Red LLC company nor Adams & Remers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither One-Red LLC company nor Adams & Remers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither One-Red LLC company nor Adams & Remers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Adams & Remers company nor One-Red LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Adams & Remers nor One-Red LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Adams & Remers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to One-Red LLC company.

Adams & Remers company employs more people globally than One-Red LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Adams & Remers nor One-Red LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Adams & Remers nor One-Red LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Adams & Remers nor One-Red LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Adams & Remers nor One-Red LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Adams & Remers nor One-Red LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Adams & Remers nor One-Red LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X