Comparison Overview

Ad Age

VS

Brandl and Schlesinger

Ad Age

685 Third Avenue , New York, NY, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.adage.com

Ad Age, a Crain family brand, is a daily must-read for an influential audience of decision makers and disruptors across the marketing and media landscape.   Created in 1930 to cover a burgeoning industry with objectivity, accuracy, and fairness, Ad Age continues to be powered by award-winning journalism. Today, Ad Age is a global media brand focusing on curated creativity, data and analysis, people and culture, and innovation and forecasting.   From vital print editions to must-attend events and innovative platform offerings, its industry-leading offerings include the coveted A-List & Creativity Awards, Ad Age Small Agency Conference & Awards, and proprietary data such as the Leading National Advertisers Report from the Ad Age Datacenter.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 795
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Brandl and Schlesinger

PO Box 127, Blackheath, NSW, 2785, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.brandl.com.au

Brandl & Schlesinger, established in 1994, has developed a reputation as one of Australia’s most renowned independent publishers. We publish and nurture first time fiction authors, with many of their titles winning major literary awards. We have a diverse list of quality fiction and non-fiction, literary memoir and biography, academic journals, translations and a distinctive poetry list. As an independent publisher we are committed to publishing books that are often overlooked by the multi-national conglomerate publishers, and that appeal to both the national and international market.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ad-age.jpeg
Ad Age
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandl-and-schlesinger.jpeg
Brandl and Schlesinger
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ad Age
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brandl and Schlesinger
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ad Age in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brandl and Schlesinger in 2025.

Incident History — Ad Age (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ad Age cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brandl and Schlesinger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brandl and Schlesinger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ad-age.jpeg
Ad Age
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandl-and-schlesinger.jpeg
Brandl and Schlesinger
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ad Age company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brandl and Schlesinger company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brandl and Schlesinger company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ad Age company.

In the current year, Brandl and Schlesinger company and Ad Age company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brandl and Schlesinger company nor Ad Age company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brandl and Schlesinger company nor Ad Age company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brandl and Schlesinger company nor Ad Age company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ad Age company nor Brandl and Schlesinger company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ad Age nor Brandl and Schlesinger holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ad Age company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Brandl and Schlesinger company.

Ad Age company employs more people globally than Brandl and Schlesinger company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Ad Age nor Brandl and Schlesinger holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ad Age nor Brandl and Schlesinger holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ad Age nor Brandl and Schlesinger holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ad Age nor Brandl and Schlesinger holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ad Age nor Brandl and Schlesinger holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ad Age nor Brandl and Schlesinger holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References