Comparison Overview

Actron Entities, Inc

VS

Sandia National Laboratories

Actron Entities, Inc

13089 60th St N, Clearwater, FL, 33760, US
Last Update: 2025-03-09 (UTC)

Excellent

Since 1963, through hard work and dedication to our customers and employees, we have become one of the leading providers of quality fabricated and machined products in the southeast. We provide full-service, close tolerance contract manufacturing of precision sheet metal components and sub-assemblies from the receipt of raw materials through various finished coating processes including chromate, textured paint and powder coating.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sandia National Laboratories

PO Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Sandia National Laboratories is the nationโ€™s premier DOE science and engineering lab for national security and technology innovation. Our team of scientists, engineers, researchers, and business specialists apply their knowledge and skill toward delivering cutting-edge technology in an array of areas. Across our main sites in Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA, our research ranges from nuclear defense and homeland and global security to innovative work in biotechnology, environmental preservation, energy, and cyber security. Our teams have shared some of the reasons they enjoy working at Sandia: โ€ข Challenging work with amazing impact that contributes to security, peace, and freedom worldwide โ€ข Extraordinary co-workers โ€ข Access to some of the best tools, equipment, and research facilities in the world (tours.sandia.gov) โ€ข Career advancement and enrichment opportunities โ€ข Work-life balance with flexible work schedules, competitive benefits, and convenient on-site amenities

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 11,974
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actron-entities-inc.jpeg
Actron Entities, Inc
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandia-national-laboratories.jpeg
Sandia National Laboratories
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Actron Entities, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sandia National Laboratories
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Actron Entities, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandia National Laboratories in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Actron Entities, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Actron Entities, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Sandia National Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandia National Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actron-entities-inc.jpeg
Actron Entities, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandia-national-laboratories.jpeg
Sandia National Laboratories
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Actron Entities, Inc company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Sandia National Laboratories company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sandia National Laboratories company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Actron Entities, Inc company.

In the current year, Sandia National Laboratories company and Actron Entities, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sandia National Laboratories company nor Actron Entities, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sandia National Laboratories company nor Actron Entities, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sandia National Laboratories company nor Actron Entities, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Actron Entities, Inc company nor Sandia National Laboratories company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Actron Entities, Inc company nor Sandia National Laboratories company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sandia National Laboratories company employs more people globally than Actron Entities, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.