Comparison Overview

ACTORUM

VS

Brown Box Theatre Project

ACTORUM

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1974, we are a leading talent management agency with a distinctive approach to doing business. We combine the mutual support and self-determination of the cooperative ethos with the focus and fierce ambition of an agency approach, all driven by our dedicated, full time lead agent. Bridging these two realms makes us unique in what we do. After plying our trade for longer than most talent management agencies have been in business, we have the trust and respect of casting directors, directors and producers across the industry as well as the UK’s leading drama schools. Since our founding by Danny Schiller, Pete Postlethwaite and ten others, we have counted household names such as Denise Black, Jennifer Saunders and Julie Walters among our members.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brown Box Theatre Project

10647 Griffin Rd, Berlin, MD, 21811, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

We, at Brown Box, believe that all people deserve easy access to the arts and the community benefits that they foster. Brown Box Theatre Project’s mission is to break down barriers that separate the masses from live theatre by bringing the very best in performance, design, and collaboration to unconventional venues and underserved destinations to reach the widest audience possible. Brown Box Theatre Project creates high-quality theatre and delivers our work directly to communities to expand the reach of impactful, professional performing arts. We implement a bold approach to our productions that connects audiences and artists through vibrant and enlightening experiences to transform the way theatre is created and consumed.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actorum.jpeg
ACTORUM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-box-theatre-project.jpeg
Brown Box Theatre Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ACTORUM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brown Box Theatre Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACTORUM in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown Box Theatre Project in 2025.

Incident History — ACTORUM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACTORUM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brown Box Theatre Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown Box Theatre Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actorum.jpeg
ACTORUM
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-box-theatre-project.jpeg
Brown Box Theatre Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ACTORUM company and Brown Box Theatre Project company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Brown Box Theatre Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ACTORUM company.

In the current year, Brown Box Theatre Project company and ACTORUM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brown Box Theatre Project company nor ACTORUM company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brown Box Theatre Project company nor ACTORUM company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brown Box Theatre Project company nor ACTORUM company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ACTORUM company nor Brown Box Theatre Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ACTORUM nor Brown Box Theatre Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ACTORUM company nor Brown Box Theatre Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both ACTORUM company and Brown Box Theatre Project company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither ACTORUM nor Brown Box Theatre Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ACTORUM nor Brown Box Theatre Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ACTORUM nor Brown Box Theatre Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ACTORUM nor Brown Box Theatre Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ACTORUM nor Brown Box Theatre Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ACTORUM nor Brown Box Theatre Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N