Comparison Overview

ActiveCampaign

VS

PhonePe

ActiveCampaign

1 N Dearborn, Chicago, IL, 60602, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

We help small teams power big businesses with the must-have platform for intelligent marketing automation. ๐Ÿš€ Customers from over 170 countries depend on our mix of pre-built automations and integrations (including Facebook, Google, WordPress, Salesforce, Shopify, and Square) to power personalized marketing, transactional emails, and one-to-one CRM interactions throughout the customer lifecycle.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 850
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PhonePe

Green Glen Layout Road, Bengaluru East, Karnataka, 560103, IN
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

PhonePe Group is Indiaโ€™s leading fintech company, proudly recognized as Indiaโ€™s #1 Trusted Digital Payments* Brand for three consecutive years. Our flagship product, the PhonePe app was launched in August 2016, has rapidly become the preferred consumer payments app in India. In just eight years, PhonePe has gained over 57 crore + registered users and established a digital payments acceptance network of over 4 crore+ merchants spread across Tier 2,3 cites and beyond, covering 99% of the postal codes in the country. Building on our leadership in digital payments, PhonePe Group has expanded into financial servicesโ€”including insurance, lending, and wealth managementโ€”along with new consumer tech ventures such as Pincode, a hyperlocal ecommerce platform, Indus App Store - Indiaโ€™s first localized app store, and Share.Market- A wealth and investment platform (app & website), catering to investors and traders needs. Headquartered in India, PhonePe Group aligns its diverse portfolio of businesses with our vision We're committed to empowering every Indian by unlocking the flow of money and providing equal access to easy & secure payments and financial services.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 15,345
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/activecampaign-inc-.jpeg
ActiveCampaign
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phonepe-internet.jpeg
PhonePe
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ActiveCampaign
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PhonePe
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ActiveCampaign in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PhonePe in 2025.

Incident History โ€” ActiveCampaign (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ActiveCampaign cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” PhonePe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PhonePe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/activecampaign-inc-.jpeg
ActiveCampaign
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phonepe-internet.jpeg
PhonePe
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ActiveCampaign company and PhonePe company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, PhonePe company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ActiveCampaign company.

In the current year, PhonePe company and ActiveCampaign company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PhonePe company nor ActiveCampaign company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PhonePe company nor ActiveCampaign company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PhonePe company nor ActiveCampaign company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ActiveCampaign company nor PhonePe company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

PhonePe company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ActiveCampaign company.

PhonePe company employs more people globally than ActiveCampaign company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X