Comparison Overview

ActiveCampaign

VS

Epic

ActiveCampaign

1 N Dearborn, Chicago, IL, 60602, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
https://www.activecampaign.com

Strong

We help small teams power big businesses with the must-have platform for intelligent marketing automation. 🚀 Customers from over 170 countries depend on our mix of pre-built automations and integrations (including Facebook, Google, WordPress, Salesforce, Shopify, and Square) to power personalized marketing, transactional emails, and one-to-one CRM interactions throughout the customer lifecycle.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 850
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Epic

1979 Milky Way, Verona, WI, 53593, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
https://www.epic.com/

Join us in our mission to help the world get well, help the world stay well, and help future generations be healthier. We hire smart and motivated people from all academic majors to code, test, and implement healthcare software that hundreds of millions of patients and doctors rely on to improve care and ultimately save lives around the globe. No healthcare experience is necessary; we'll train you to be an expert in health IT and we'll provide you with personal development classes to grow as a professional. Our expectations for you are high, but in healthcare so are the stakes.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 15,615
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/activecampaign-inc-.jpeg
ActiveCampaign
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic_163658.jpeg
Epic
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ActiveCampaign
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Epic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ActiveCampaign in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epic in 2025.

Incident History — ActiveCampaign (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ActiveCampaign cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Epic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/activecampaign-inc-.jpeg
ActiveCampaign
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic_163658.jpeg
Epic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ActiveCampaign company and Epic company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Epic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ActiveCampaign company.

In the current year, Epic company and ActiveCampaign company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Epic company nor ActiveCampaign company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Epic company nor ActiveCampaign company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Epic company nor ActiveCampaign company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ActiveCampaign company nor Epic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ActiveCampaign company nor Epic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Epic company employs more people globally than ActiveCampaign company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References